English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4)
Published
Last updated 11 October 2017 - see all updates
This page has been archived.
It has been replaced by
English Baccalaureate entry and achievement.
There is a new version of this page. View the latest version.
- 1. Navigate to Main facts and figures section
- 2. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity section
- 3. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity and eligibility for free school meals (FSM) section
- 4. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity and area section
- 5. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity and gender section
- 6. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and eligibility for free school meals (FSM) section
- 7. Navigate to EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and area section
- 8. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and basis for school admission section
- 9. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity and type of school section
- 10. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity, special education needs (SEN) and gender section
- 11. Navigate toEBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and religion of school section
- 12. Navigate to Methodology section
- 13. Navigate to Data sources section
- 14. Navigate to Download the data section
1. Main facts and figures
-
in 2015/16, there were 540,689 pupils in key stage 4, of which ethnicity was known for 534,918 pupils (99%)
-
79% were White, 10% were Asian, 5% were Black, 4% were Mixed, 1.5% came from the Other ethnic group and 0.4% were Chinese
-
40% of pupils in state-funded mainstream schools entered the EBacc in 2015/16
-
63% of Chinese pupils entered the EBacc, the highest percentage of any ethnic group
-
5% of Gypsy/Roma pupils entered the EBacc, the lowest percentage of any ethnic group
-
across all ethnic groups, girls were more likely to enter the EBacc than boys
-
across all ethnic groups, pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) were less likely to enter the EBacc than those not eligible
Things you need to know
Please be aware that some of the statistics quoted here for some ethnic groups are based on very small numbers of pupils and are highly variable over time.
Attainment is lower for children from a Traveller of Irish heritage background – however, there were only 122 pupils from this background in key stage 4 in 2015/16, a much smaller number than for other ethnic groups (for example, there were 20,434 Pakistani pupils in key stage 4). Therefore, data comparisons between Traveller of Irish Heritage pupils and other ethnic groups may be unreliable.
The ethnicity of 1.1% of pupils (5,771) is not accounted for. This includes pupils whose ethnicity was not surveyed, pupils who refused to be surveyed, and pupils whose ethnicity could not be determined.
Any unapproved qualifications, such as unregulated international GCSEs, are not included in this data. Therefore, this data does not represent all qualifications taken by pupils, but only those that are approved by the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) and count towards the secondary school performance tables. The figures vary between ‘all schools’ and ‘state schools’ mainly due to the impact of unregulated international GCSEs taken in independent schools.
In the published ‘statistical first release’ (SFR) for EBacc entry, the Department of Education (DfE) has ‘suppressed’ very small numbers (for example, values of 1 or 2, a percentage based on 1 or 2 pupils who achieved, or 0, 1 or 2 pupils who did not achieve a particular level). This is because, where the size of the ethnic group population is small enough that an individual’s identity could come to light, information is excluded, or 'suppressed', to preserve confidentiality. This is consistent with DfE’s statistical policy statement on confidentiality (PDF opens in a new window or tab).
Data for some Muslim and Sikh schools was not included in the statistics for faith schools, because the small numbers of pupils make it impossible to draw meaningful conclusions about their attainment. Data for faith schools is also only provided for pupils in state-funded mainstream schools.
What the data measures
This data measures the number of pupils entering the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) by ethnic group. It also shows each ethnic group’s share of all EBacc entry, by percentage.
The data covers the academic year 2015/16 (September 2015 to July 2016).
The EBacc is a school performance measure. It allows people to see how many pupils get a grade C or above in the core academic subjects (English, Maths, Science, a language, and History or Geography) at key stage 4 in any government-funded school. It was first introduced into the performance tables in the 2009 academic year.
Key stage 4 covers school years 10 and 11, when children are aged 14 to 16.
The ethnic categories used in this data
This data uses categories from the Department of Education’s school census, which is broadly based on the 2001 national census, with three exceptions:
- Traveller of Irish Heritage and Gypsy/Roma children have been separated into two categories
- Sri Lankan has been added to the Asian/Asian British group but is not reported separately
- Chinese pupils have been assigned a separate category
These changes were made after consultations with local authorities and lobby groups.
The categories in the school census are as follows:
White:
- White British
- White Irish
- Traveller of Irish Heritage
- Gypsy/Roma
- Other White
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups:
- White and Black Caribbean
- White and Black African
- White and Asian
- Other Mixed background
Asian/Asian British:
- Indian
- Pakistani
- Bangladeshi
- Sri Lankan
- Other Asian background
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British:
- Black African
- Black Caribbean
- Other Black background
Chinese
Other ethnic group
Information is provided for both detailed and broad ethnic groups categories where possible and when the data is available.
The 6 broad categories used are as follows:
- White
- Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups
- Asian/Asian British
- Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
- Other ethnic group
- Chinese
However, region, local authority, school admission, school type, special education needs (SEN) and religion of school data is only provided for 5 broad ethnic groups. Information about the specific ethnic categories is excluded to preserve confidentiality and ensure individuals cannot be identified. Information about the Other ethnic group is not given because DfE does not publish data for this group at these levels.
The 5 broad categories are as follows:
- White
- Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups
- Asian/Asian British
- Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
- Chinese
2. EBacc entry by ethnicity
Ethnicity | % | Pupils |
---|---|---|
All | 40 | 540,689 |
Asian | 47 | 51,218 |
Bangladeshi | 46 | 8,319 |
Indian | 56 | 14,046 |
Pakistani | 39 | 20,434 |
Asian other | 53 | 8,419 |
Black | 43 | 27,924 |
Black African | 47 | 17,349 |
Black Caribbean | 36 | 7,216 |
Black other | 40 | 3,359 |
Chinese | 63 | 2,026 |
Mixed | 42 | 22,868 |
Mixed White/Asian | 50 | 5,089 |
Mixed White/Black African | 42 | 2,687 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 33 | 7,160 |
Mixed other | 46 | 7,932 |
White | 38 | 422,763 |
White British | 38 | 395,316 |
White Irish | 50 | 1,774 |
White Irish Traveller | 12 | 122 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 5 | 1,107 |
White other | 45 | 24,444 |
Other | 49 | 8,119 |
Unknown | 34 | 5,771 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity Summary
-
in 2015/16, 40% of all pupils entered the EBacc
-
63% of Chinese pupils entered the EBacc (the highest percentage of any group)
-
Gypsy/Roma pupils had the lowest percentage entering the EBacc (5%), followed by pupils from a Traveller of Irish heritage background (12%)
-
other groups below the national average were White and Black Caribbean, Black Caribbean, White British and Pakistani pupils
3. EBacc entry by ethnicity and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)
FSM | Non-FSM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ethnicity | FSM % | FSM Pupils | Non-FSM % | Non-FSM Pupils |
All | 23 | 72,528 | 42 | 468,161 |
Asian | 36 | 9,018 | 50 | 42,200 |
Bangladeshi | 42 | 2,461 | 48 | 5,858 |
Indian | 41 | 1,042 | 57 | 13,004 |
Pakistani | 31 | 4,536 | 41 | 15,898 |
Asian other | 41 | 979 | 55 | 7,440 |
Black | 35 | 6,544 | 46 | 21,380 |
Black African | 39 | 4,086 | 49 | 13,263 |
Black Caribbean | 26 | 1,689 | 39 | 5,527 |
Black other | 31 | 769 | 42 | 2,590 |
Chinese | 55 | 130 | 63 | 1,896 |
Mixed | 27 | 4,240 | 46 | 18,628 |
Mixed White/Asian | 28 | 732 | 54 | 4,357 |
Mixed White/Black African | 32 | 529 | 45 | 2,158 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 21 | 1,620 | 37 | 5,540 |
Mixed other | 32 | 1,359 | 49 | 6,573 |
White | 18 | 49,595 | 41 | 373,168 |
White British | 17 | 46,438 | 41 | 348,878 |
White Irish | 24 | 213 | 53 | 1,561 |
White Irish Traveller | 10 | 73 | 16 | 49 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 5 | 330 | 5 | 777 |
White other | 36 | 2,541 | 47 | 21,903 |
Other | 42 | 2,024 | 51 | 6,095 |
Unknown | 21 | 977 | 37 | 4,794 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity and eligibility for free school meals (FSM) Summary
Eligibility for FSM is used as an indicator of deprivation by the Department of Education. More detail about who qualifies for FSM can be found in the Methodology section.
The data shows that:
-
In 2015/16, there were 72,528 pupils at the end of key stage 4 eligible for free school meals (13%)
-
the breakdown of pupils eligible for FSM at the end of key stage 4 is: 12% of White pupils, 19% of pupils from a Mixed ethnic background, 18% of Asian pupils, 23% of Black pupils, 6% of Chinese pupils, and 25% of pupils from the Other ethnic background
-
overall, the percentage of pupils entering the EBacc was lower for those eligible for FSM than for all other pupils: 23% of FSM-eligible pupils did so compared to 42% of those not eligible
-
Chinese pupils had the highest percentage of FSM-eligible pupils entering the EBacc, at 55%, and Gypsy/Roma pupils had the lowest at 5%
-
Irish pupils saw the largest difference between the groups, at 29 percentage points, with 24% of FSM-eligible pupils entering compared to 53% of all other Irish pupils
4. EBacc entry by ethnicity and area
Local authority | All | White | Mixed | Asian | Black | Chinese |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | % | % | % | % | % | |
England | 39.8 | 38.3 | 42.4 | 47.7 | 43.4 | 63.7 |
County Durham | 41.7 | 41.5 | 61.9 | 75.8 | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Darlington | 38.2 | 37.8 | 46.7 | 42.9 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Gateshead | 40.5 | 39.7 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 35.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Hartlepool | 36.1 | 35.6 | 50.0 | 64.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Middlesbrough | 20.2 | 20.3 | 24.5 | 21.5 | 26.7 | N/A* |
Newcastle upon Tyne | 36.1 | 34.2 | 52.3 | 44.6 | 35.0 | 69.2 |
North Tyneside | 37.8 | 37.0 | 51.4 | 44.7 | 72.7 | 66.7 |
Northumberland | 32.2 | 32.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Redcar and Cleveland | 29.2 | 28.8 | 45.0 | 42.9 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
South Tyneside | 34.7 | 34.0 | 35.3 | 49.1 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* |
Stockton-on-Tees | 40.2 | 39.8 | 44.0 | 42.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Sunderland | 36.9 | 36.0 | 55.6 | 56.7 | 62.5 | 100.0 |
Blackburn with Darwen | 35.1 | 25.5 | 32.8 | 47.5 | 20.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Blackpool | 18.5 | 18.3 | 16.7 | 31.6 | 33.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bolton | 32.7 | 26.1 | 30.7 | 57.6 | 37.9 | 57.1 |
Bury | 48.3 | 48.3 | 48.5 | 48.4 | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Cheshire East | 38.5 | 38.7 | 35.5 | 38.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 60.0 |
Cheshire West and Chester | 47.1 | 47.2 | 50.0 | 37.8 | 41.7 | 62.5 |
Cumbria | 36.6 | 36.5 | 43.4 | 38.7 | 46.2 | 66.7 |
Halton | 57.5 | 57.2 | 68.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* |
Knowsley | 23.6 | 23.1 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Lancashire | 33.4 | 33.1 | 33.9 | 35.7 | 31.6 | 40.6 |
Liverpool | 40.0 | 40.2 | 26.6 | 60.6 | 42.3 | 64.4 |
Manchester | 35.5 | 32.7 | 29.7 | 44.3 | 32.4 | 51.2 |
Oldham | 24.8 | 26.8 | 17.8 | 22.0 | 14.9 | 42.9 |
Rochdale | 26.3 | 21.7 | 33.7 | 36.5 | 36.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Salford | 45.6 | 45.0 | 46.3 | 55.3 | 47.4 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Sefton | 42.6 | 43.4 | 36.7 | 52.2 | 60.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
St. Helens | 36.5 | 37.4 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Stockport | 46.1 | 45.6 | 47.6 | 56.5 | 38.1 | 50.0 |
Tameside | 31.0 | 30.7 | 28.4 | 34.8 | 28.6 | 41.7 |
Trafford | 46.7 | 46.4 | 50.0 | 45.6 | 36.0 | 71.4 |
Warrington | 37.5 | 37.1 | 34.3 | 53.1 | 42.9 | 50.0 |
Wigan | 33.6 | 33.3 | 36.4 | 30.0 | 68.8 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Wirral | 49.7 | 49.1 | 52.2 | 67.2 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78.6 |
Barnsley | 28.6 | 28.5 | 40.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33.3 | N/A* |
Bradford | 32.2 | 31.3 | 31.7 | 33.6 | 30.9 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Calderdale | 35.1 | 35.5 | 29.0 | 34.7 | 40.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Doncaster | 27.4 | 27.2 | 29.5 | 28.6 | 42.9 | 60.0 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 36.9 | 36.6 | 28.3 | 58.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Kingston upon Hull, City of | 40.3 | 41.5 | 40.9 | 64.7 | 43.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Kirklees | 36.1 | 35.9 | 29.8 | 39.0 | 25.9 | 60.0 |
Leeds | 40.8 | 40.9 | 40.9 | 43.1 | 36.8 | 50.0 |
North East Lincolnshire | 35.1 | 35.3 | 31.6 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
North Lincolnshire | 32.8 | 32.5 | 36.8 | 37.1 | 36.4 | 100.0 |
North Yorkshire | 41.1 | 40.9 | 42.7 | 44.1 | 44.4 | 61.5 |
Rotherham | 31.2 | 31.5 | 37.9 | 20.8 | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Sheffield | 39.4 | 39.0 | 40.4 | 39.1 | 37.7 | 61.1 |
Wakefield | 33.0 | 32.8 | 34.4 | 39.7 | 21.1 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
York | 56.3 | 55.9 | 66.7 | 72.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
Derby | 32.8 | 30.5 | 36.1 | 43.6 | 22.4 | 50.0 |
Derbyshire | 31.0 | 30.8 | 28.0 | 38.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 35.7 |
Leicester | 32.2 | 19.1 | 28.6 | 42.6 | 31.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Leicestershire | 31.5 | 29.7 | 35.8 | 50.5 | 20.9 | 54.5 |
Lincolnshire | 43.6 | 43.0 | 55.2 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 44.1 | 75.8 |
Northamptonshire | 40.5 | 39.7 | 39.4 | 49.1 | 44.7 | 70.0 |
Nottingham | 32.2 | 27.6 | 37.2 | 42.0 | 31.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Nottinghamshire | 40.8 | 40.1 | 39.6 | 56.1 | 55.1 | 68.0 |
Rutland | 32.7 | 32.4 | 55.6 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* |
Birmingham | 41.9 | 40.0 | 41.2 | 43.8 | 38.8 | 66.7 |
Coventry | 39.5 | 35.8 | 39.2 | 49.4 | 46.4 | 66.7 |
Dudley | 33.1 | 33.1 | 27.9 | 33.9 | 42.9 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Herefordshire, County of | 43.1 | 42.9 | 52.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Sandwell | 22.3 | 18.7 | 21.1 | 30.0 | 21.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Shropshire | 38.3 | 38.3 | 39.6 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50.0 |
Solihull | 44.8 | 44.5 | 39.2 | 53.6 | 44.4 | 50.0 |
Staffordshire | 34.7 | 34.7 | 33.9 | 35.4 | 32.4 | 50.0 |
Stoke-on-Trent | 27.9 | 26.9 | 21.7 | 32.6 | 37.5 | 55.6 |
Telford and Wrekin | 46.2 | 45.9 | 47.1 | 49.6 | 38.9 | 66.7 |
Walsall | 35.7 | 33.0 | 33.5 | 45.4 | 37.4 | 100.0 |
Warwickshire | 42.2 | 41.4 | 46.0 | 54.4 | 32.0 | 62.5 |
Wolverhampton | 25.7 | 22.4 | 20.2 | 40.2 | 19.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Worcestershire | 39.3 | 39.8 | 40.2 | 26.8 | 20.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bedford | 31.4 | 32.9 | 27.3 | 26.7 | 27.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Cambridgeshire | 41.3 | 40.2 | 50.0 | 54.7 | 35.7 | 76.7 |
Central Bedfordshire | 36.1 | 35.0 | 37.9 | 58.7 | 61.4 | 50.0 |
Essex | 38.0 | 36.3 | 47.1 | 70.9 | 54.7 | 62.7 |
Hertfordshire | 46.0 | 44.7 | 46.2 | 55.9 | 50.6 | 74.6 |
Luton | 33.4 | 24.2 | 25.0 | 43.2 | 35.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Norfolk | 35.6 | 35.4 | 34.8 | 51.1 | 42.6 | 48.0 |
Peterborough | 37.7 | 35.8 | 41.9 | 42.5 | 50.7 | 62.5 |
Southend-on-Sea | 41.6 | 37.1 | 44.0 | 70.4 | 62.4 | 68.2 |
Suffolk | 30.2 | 29.8 | 33.1 | 46.1 | 24.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Thurrock | 41.8 | 39.6 | 50.8 | 55.4 | 51.2 | 55.6 |
Camden | 45.9 | 49.4 | 42.3 | 45.2 | 39.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
City of London | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* |
Hackney | 52.5 | 53.3 | 51.3 | 61.4 | 48.7 | 66.7 |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 64.6 | 67.9 | 69.2 | 65.5 | 55.3 | 50.0 |
Haringey | 39.1 | 40.9 | 42.7 | 48.0 | 30.4 | 25.0 |
Islington | 44.5 | 40.3 | 36.7 | 49.4 | 47.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Kensington and Chelsea | 52.4 | 54.5 | 54.0 | 61.5 | 43.2 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Lambeth | 50.6 | 50.3 | 45.2 | 59.5 | 50.9 | 66.7 |
Lewisham | 42.4 | 42.1 | 46.9 | 57.4 | 38.0 | 56.8 |
Newham | 51.5 | 36.1 | 49.7 | 58.5 | 48.3 | 45.5 |
Southwark | 57.9 | 55.2 | 56.1 | 66.1 | 58.2 | 73.5 |
Tower Hamlets | 46.1 | 29.4 | 27.9 | 52.7 | 43.6 | 50.0 |
Wandsworth | 58.4 | 56.4 | 55.3 | 70.0 | 52.8 | 78.6 |
Westminster | 48.6 | 55.9 | 48.5 | 45.2 | 43.5 | 61.1 |
Barking and Dagenham | 35.2 | 33.0 | 24.8 | 40.7 | 38.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Barnet | 60.1 | 56.8 | 62.5 | 75.2 | 54.8 | 78.3 |
Bexley | 43.5 | 37.2 | 42.9 | 60.9 | 58.8 | 72.5 |
Brent | 54.6 | 48.7 | 52.5 | 63.1 | 44.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bromley | 50.9 | 51.7 | 53.7 | 66.5 | 45.2 | 72.2 |
Croydon | 44.6 | 44.7 | 46.7 | 55.2 | 43.5 | 76.2 |
Ealing | 55.4 | 61.4 | 59.0 | 48.5 | 49.1 | 100.0 |
Enfield | 54.8 | 54.0 | 56.2 | 70.0 | 50.1 | 80.0 |
Greenwich | 47.3 | 40.6 | 50.5 | 60.9 | 52.2 | 66.7 |
Harrow | 54.0 | 47.9 | 55.8 | 57.2 | 53.2 | 72.7 |
Havering | 48.6 | 46.8 | 50.4 | 62.4 | 55.5 | 54.5 |
Hillingdon | 42.2 | 34.6 | 40.8 | 57.5 | 41.6 | 41.7 |
Hounslow | 57.2 | 54.9 | 65.2 | 67.7 | 53.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Kingston upon Thames | 60.7 | 55.7 | 64.3 | 74.6 | 45.2 | 69.6 |
Merton | 42.2 | 44.3 | 40.0 | 48.6 | 31.1 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Redbridge | 43.0 | 35.3 | 37.8 | 51.3 | 32.0 | 70.0 |
Richmond upon Thames | 56.9 | 56.9 | 63.7 | 56.3 | 47.9 | 66.7 |
Sutton | 55.8 | 44.4 | 61.7 | 82.1 | 63.7 | 80.5 |
Waltham Forest | 39.3 | 38.8 | 37.0 | 46.1 | 32.3 | 31.8 |
Bracknell Forest | 37.8 | 36.9 | 51.0 | 24.4 | 53.8 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Brighton and Hove | 39.1 | 38.0 | 47.5 | 41.5 | 46.3 | 100.0 |
Buckinghamshire | 44.3 | 44.7 | 40.7 | 43.6 | 34.1 | 66.7 |
East Sussex | 34.6 | 34.4 | 38.6 | 45.0 | 35.5 | 55.6 |
Hampshire | 41.2 | 40.9 | 43.4 | 52.6 | 43.5 | 62.9 |
Isle of Wight | 28.4 | 28.2 | 44.4 | 25.0 | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Kent | 43.3 | 41.7 | 54.7 | 62.9 | 53.8 | 67.2 |
Medway | 37.1 | 35.3 | 39.2 | 58.0 | 44.0 | 72.7 |
Milton Keynes | 44.3 | 41.0 | 46.0 | 54.9 | 54.4 | 46.7 |
Oxfordshire | 37.9 | 37.6 | 38.2 | 42.9 | 31.7 | 42.3 |
Portsmouth | 37.9 | 36.6 | 42.6 | 46.3 | 45.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Reading | 37.3 | 37.3 | 23.5 | 43.9 | 23.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Slough | 41.6 | 38.6 | 36.6 | 45.6 | 27.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Southampton | 40.3 | 38.4 | 35.8 | 55.7 | 42.9 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Surrey | 46.0 | 45.3 | 48.2 | 51.7 | 48.9 | 75.0 |
West Berkshire | 48.0 | 48.7 | 46.7 | 54.0 | 32.0 | 66.7 |
West Sussex | 41.0 | 40.5 | 46.5 | 50.6 | 34.2 | 50.0 |
Windsor and Maidenhead | 44.1 | 43.3 | 51.5 | 46.6 | 34.5 | 62.5 |
Wokingham | 53.3 | 53.2 | 48.3 | 57.2 | 46.7 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bath and North East Somerset | 52.3 | 52.9 | 37.8 | 54.2 | 37.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bournemouth | 42.9 | 41.1 | 53.4 | 67.5 | 41.2 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Bristol, City of | 32.0 | 31.5 | 34.0 | 36.8 | 24.1 | 33.3 |
Cornwall | 32.8 | 32.7 | 38.4 | 33.3 | 33.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Devon | 42.7 | 42.6 | 38.9 | 61.5 | 50.0 | 76.9 |
Dorset | 46.4 | 46.5 | 46.3 | 34.8 | 33.3 | 45.5 |
Gloucestershire | 34.8 | 34.1 | 37.4 | 60.3 | 17.5 | 65.2 |
Isles of Scilly | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* |
North Somerset | 31.6 | 31.0 | 47.0 | 40.6 | 20.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Plymouth | 39.8 | 38.9 | 48.8 | 72.0 | 50.0 | 61.5 |
Poole | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39.1 | 40.4 | 61.3 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Somerset | 35.5 | 35.5 | 38.0 | 44.0 | 28.6 | 54.5 |
South Gloucestershire | 32.7 | 32.8 | 28.4 | 40.3 | 25.6 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Swindon | 32.8 | 30.9 | 30.0 | 47.7 | 35.7 | 40.0 |
Torbay | 32.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 42.5 | 50.0 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Wiltshire | 41.5 | 41.2 | 52.2 | 42.9 | 39.5 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and area’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and area’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity and area Summary
The data shows that:
-
Hammersmith and Fulham had the highest overall percentage of pupils entering the EBacc (65%), with 69% of Mixed pupils, 68% of White pupils, 66% of Asian pupils, 55% of Black pupils and 50% of Chinese pupils doing so
-
Blackpool had the lowest overall percentage of pupils entering (19%), with 17% of Mixed pupils, 18% of White pupils, 32% of Asian pupils, 33% of Black pupils
-
the number of Chinese pupils entering the EBacc in Blackpool was very small, so information about them was withheld to protect confidentiality
-
the local authority where Asian students were most likely to enter the EBacc was Sutton, where 82% entered; they were least likely to enter in Rotherham, where 21% did so
-
the local authority where Black pupils were least likely to enter was North Tyneside, where 73% entered the EBacc; they were least likely to enter in Oldham, where 15% did so
-
White and Mixed pupils were most likely to enter in Hammersmith and Fulham, where 68% and 69% respectively did so, and least likely in Blackpool, where 18% and 17% respectively did so
-
in 5 local authorities, 100% of Chinese pupils entered the EBacc: Ealing, Sunderland, Brighton and Hove, North Lincolnshire and Walsall
-
Chinese pupils were least likely to enter in Haringey, where 25% did so
5. EBacc entry by ethnicity and gender
All | Boys | Girls | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethnicity | All % | All Pupils | Boys % | Boys Pupils | Girls % | Girls Pupils |
All | 40 | 540,689 | 34 | 275,606 | 45 | 265,083 |
Asian | 47 | 51,218 | 41 | 26,559 | 54 | 24,659 |
Bangladeshi | 46 | 8,319 | 41 | 4,239 | 52 | 4,080 |
Indian | 56 | 14,046 | 50 | 7,321 | 63 | 6,725 |
Pakistani | 39 | 20,434 | 32 | 10,559 | 46 | 9,875 |
Asian other | 53 | 8,419 | 47 | 4,440 | 61 | 3,979 |
Black | 43 | 27,924 | 36 | 13,911 | 50 | 14,013 |
Black African | 47 | 17,349 | 40 | 8,669 | 54 | 8,680 |
Black Caribbean | 36 | 7,216 | 28 | 3,548 | 44 | 3,668 |
Black other | 40 | 3,359 | 32 | 1,694 | 47 | 1,665 |
Chinese | 63 | 2,026 | 56 | 1,033 | 70 | 993 |
Mixed | 42 | 22,868 | 37 | 11,535 | 47 | 11,333 |
Mixed White/Asian | 50 | 5,089 | 44 | 2,542 | 56 | 2,547 |
Mixed White/Black African | 42 | 2,687 | 37 | 1,354 | 47 | 1,333 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 33 | 7,160 | 28 | 3,614 | 38 | 3,546 |
Mixed other | 46 | 7,932 | 42 | 4,025 | 51 | 3,907 |
White | 38 | 422,763 | 33 | 215,354 | 43 | 207,409 |
White British | 38 | 395,316 | 33 | 201,407 | 43 | 193,909 |
White Irish | 50 | 1,774 | 44 | 883 | 55 | 891 |
White Irish Traveller | 12 | 122 | 8 | 67 | 18 | 55 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 5 | 1,107 | 4 | 534 | 6 | 573 |
White other | 45 | 24,444 | 41 | 12,463 | 51 | 11,981 |
Other | 49 | 8,119 | 43 | 4,242 | 55 | 3,877 |
Unknown | 34 | 5,771 | 29 | 2,972 | 40 | 2,799 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and gender’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and gender’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity and gender Summary
The data shows that:
-
the percentage of pupils entering the EBacc was higher for girls (45%) than for boys (34%) across all ethnic groups
-
in the broad ethnic groups, Chinese girls had the highest percentage of pupils entering the EBacc (70%), while White boys had the lowest (33%)
-
in the specific ethnic groups, White Gypsy/Roma boys had the lowest percentage entering the Ebacc (4%)
-
Black Caribbean pupils showed the biggest difference between boys and girls, at 16 percentage points: 44% of girls entered the Ebacc, while 28% of boys did so
-
Gypsy/Roma pupils showed the smallest percentage difference between girls and boys for pupils entering the EBacc: 6% of girls entered, while 4% of boys did so
6. EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)
Non-FSM Boys | Non-FSM Girls | FSM Boys | FSM Girls | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethnicity | Non-FSM Boys % | Non-FSM Boys Pupils | Non-FSM Girls % | Non-FSM Girls Pupils | FSM Boys % | FSM Boys Pupils | FSM Girls % | FSM Girls Pupils |
All | 37 | 238,526 | 48 | 229,635 | 19 | 37,080 | 27 | 35,448 |
Asian | 43 | 21,835 | 56 | 20,365 | 31 | 4,724 | 42 | 4,294 |
Bangladeshi | 41 | 2,972 | 55 | 2,886 | 39 | 1,267 | 45 | 1,194 |
Indian | 51 | 6,782 | 64 | 6,222 | 34 | 539 | 48 | 503 |
Pakistani | 35 | 8,163 | 48 | 7,735 | 24 | 2,396 | 38 | 2,140 |
Asian other | 48 | 3,918 | 63 | 3,522 | 38 | 522 | 46 | 457 |
Black | 38 | 10,594 | 53 | 10,786 | 28 | 3,317 | 42 | 3,227 |
Black African | 42 | 6,594 | 56 | 6,669 | 32 | 2,075 | 47 | 2,011 |
Black Caribbean | 31 | 2,710 | 47 | 2,817 | 20 | 838 | 32 | 851 |
Black other | 34 | 1,290 | 50 | 1,300 | 24 | 404 | 38 | 365 |
Chinese | 57 | 966 | 70 | 930 | 45 | 67 | 67 | 63 |
Mixed | 41 | 9,414 | 51 | 9,214 | 22 | 2,121 | 31 | 2,119 |
Mixed White/Asian | 48 | 2,180 | 59 | 2,177 | 22 | 362 | 33 | 370 |
Mixed White/Black African | 40 | 1,079 | 50 | 1,079 | 26 | 275 | 39 | 254 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 31 | 2,798 | 42 | 2,742 | 16 | 816 | 25 | 804 |
Mixed other | 44 | 3,357 | 54 | 3,216 | 28 | 668 | 35 | 691 |
White | 36 | 190,070 | 46 | 183,098 | 15 | 25,284 | 21 | 24,311 |
White British | 35 | 177,753 | 46 | 171,125 | 14 | 23,654 | 20 | 22,784 |
White Irish | 47 | 768 | 59 | 793 | 25 | 115 | 24 | 98 |
White Irish Traveller | 12 | 26 | 22 | 23 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 41 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 32 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 5 | 377 | 6 | 400 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 157 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 173 |
White other | 42 | 11,146 | 52 | 10,757 | 32 | 1,317 | 39 | 1,224 |
Other | 46 | 3,182 | 57 | 2,913 | 37 | 1,060 | 48 | 964 |
Unknown | 31 | 2,465 | 43 | 2,329 | 16 | 507 | 26 | 470 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and eligibility for free school meals (FSM)’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and eligibility for free school meals (FSM) Summary
Eligibility for FSM is used as an indicator of deprivation by the Department of Education. For more about who qualifies for FSM see the Methodology section at the end of this measure.
The data shows that:
-
a larger percentage of girls eligible for FSM entered the EBacc (27%) than eligible boys (19%) across all ethnic groups apart from Irish
-
14% of FSM-eligible White British boys entered the Ebacc, compared to 35% of non-eligible White British boys, a difference of 21 percentage points
-
the biggest difference between FSM-eligible boys and non-eligible boys entering the EBacc was for Mixed White and Asian pupils
-
20% of FSM-eligible White British girls entered the Ebacc, compared to 46% of non-eligible White British girls, a difference of 26 percentage points
-
the biggest difference between FSM-eligible girls and non-eligible girls entering the EBacc was for White Irish pupils
-
Chinese pupils eligible for FSM showed the biggest difference, at 22 percentage points, between genders for pupils entering the EBacc: 67% of girls entered, while 45% of boys did so
7. EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and area
All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local authority | All All | All Boys | All Girls | Asian All | Asian Boys | Asian Girls | Black All | Black Boys | Black Girls | Chinese All | Chinese Boys | Chinese Girls | Mixed All | Mixed Boys | Mixed Girls | White All | White Boys | White Girls |
All - England | 40 | 35 | 45 | 48 | 42 | 54 | 43 | 36 | 51 | 64 | 57 | 71 | 42 | 37 | 48 | 38 | 33 | 44 |
Barking and Dagenham | 35 | 28 | 42 | 41 | 30 | 52 | 39 | 29 | 47 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 25 | 21 | 28 | 33 | 29 | 38 |
Barnet | 60 | 57 | 63 | 75 | 76 | 74 | 55 | 50 | 59 | 78 | 71 | 84 | 63 | 61 | 64 | 57 | 53 | 61 |
Barnsley | 29 | 25 | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 40 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 29 | 25 | 33 |
Bath and North East Somerset | 52 | 50 | 55 | 54 | 58 | 50 | 38 | 36 | 40 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 37 | 39 | 53 | 50 | 56 |
Bedford | 31 | 26 | 37 | 27 | 19 | 35 | 28 | 19 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 27 | 23 | 31 | 33 | 28 | 39 |
Bexley | 44 | 38 | 49 | 61 | 52 | 71 | 59 | 46 | 72 | 73 | 68 | 78 | 43 | 38 | 49 | 37 | 34 | 41 |
Birmingham | 42 | 36 | 49 | 44 | 37 | 51 | 39 | 27 | 50 | 67 | 48 | 83 | 41 | 40 | 43 | 40 | 35 | 46 |
Blackburn with Darwen | 35 | 30 | 41 | 48 | 38 | 58 | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | 33 | 23 | 42 | 26 | 23 | 28 |
Blackpool | 19 | 14 | 23 | 32 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 17 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 18 | 14 | 23 |
Bolton | 33 | 28 | 39 | 58 | 47 | 70 | 38 | 32 | 43 | 57 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 31 | 15 | 48 | 26 | 23 | 30 |
Bournemouth | 43 | 39 | 47 | 68 | 69 | 64 | 41 | 50 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 53 | 48 | 61 | 41 | 37 | 45 |
Bracknell Forest | 38 | 32 | 44 | 24 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 54 | 46 | 62 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 51 | 56 | 46 | 37 | 31 | 43 |
Bradford | 32 | 25 | 39 | 34 | 26 | 42 | 31 | 21 | 41 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 32 | 26 | 37 | 31 | 25 | 38 |
Brent | 55 | 49 | 61 | 63 | 57 | 69 | 44 | 40 | 49 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 53 | 42 | 65 | 49 | 41 | 57 |
Brighton and Hove | 39 | 36 | 42 | 42 | 41 | 42 | 46 | 41 | 53 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 48 | 45 | 51 | 38 | 35 | 41 |
Bristol, City of | 32 | 26 | 38 | 37 | 24 | 51 | 24 | 17 | 30 | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 34 | 27 | 42 | 32 | 26 | 37 |
Bromley | 51 | 42 | 59 | 67 | 60 | 73 | 45 | 33 | 55 | 72 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 54 | 52 | 55 | 52 | 42 | 61 |
Buckinghamshire | 44 | 40 | 48 | 44 | 39 | 49 | 34 | 27 | 41 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 41 | 38 | 44 | 45 | 41 | 49 |
Bury | 48 | 46 | 51 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 50 | 35 | 69 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 49 | 45 | 52 | 48 | 46 | 51 |
Calderdale | 35 | 30 | 41 | 35 | 30 | 39 | 40 | 25 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 29 | 19 | 37 | 36 | 30 | 41 |
Cambridgeshire | 41 | 36 | 47 | 55 | 47 | 64 | 36 | 28 | 46 | 77 | 59 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 62 | 40 | 35 | 45 |
Camden | 46 | 39 | 51 | 45 | 42 | 48 | 40 | 35 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 42 | 28 | 52 | 49 | 42 | 55 |
Central Bedfordshire | 36 | 30 | 42 | 59 | 46 | 73 | 61 | 52 | 70 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 32 | 44 | 35 | 30 | 40 |
Cheshire East | 39 | 30 | 47 | 39 | 35 | 42 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 60 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 19 | 53 | 39 | 30 | 47 |
Cheshire West and Chester | 47 | 42 | 52 | 38 | 33 | 42 | 42 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | 45 | 56 | 47 | 42 | 52 |
City of London | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* |
Cornwall | 33 | 28 | 38 | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 36 | 41 | 33 | 27 | 38 |
County Durham | 42 | 37 | 47 | 76 | 82 | 69 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 62 | 63 | 62 | 42 | 36 | 47 |
Coventry | 40 | 33 | 46 | 49 | 41 | 58 | 46 | 41 | 51 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39 | 30 | 49 | 36 | 31 | 42 |
Croydon | 45 | 35 | 54 | 55 | 48 | 63 | 44 | 34 | 54 | 76 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | 39 | 52 | 45 | 34 | 54 |
Cumbria | 37 | 32 | 42 | 39 | 29 | 47 | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 67 | 100 | 50 | 43 | 32 | 52 | 37 | 32 | 41 |
Darlington | 38 | 34 | 43 | 43 | 38 | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 34 | 42 |
Derby | 33 | 28 | 38 | 44 | 38 | 49 | 22 | 15 | 28 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 30 | 42 | 31 | 26 | 35 |
Derbyshire | 31 | 26 | 36 | 39 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 21 | 35 | 31 | 25 | 36 |
Devon | 43 | 38 | 47 | 62 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 43 | 57 | 77 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39 | 37 | 41 | 43 | 38 | 47 |
Doncaster | 27 | 22 | 33 | 29 | 26 | 31 | 43 | 41 | 44 | 60 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 30 | 17 | 42 | 27 | 22 | 33 |
Dorset | 46 | 43 | 50 | 35 | 29 | 41 | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 46 | 48 | 43 | 47 | 43 | 50 |
Dudley | 33 | 29 | 38 | 34 | 25 | 44 | 43 | 36 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 26 | 30 | 33 | 29 | 37 |
Ealing | 55 | 50 | 61 | 49 | 42 | 56 | 49 | 44 | 54 | 100 | N/A* | 100 | 59 | 53 | 64 | 61 | 56 | 67 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 37 | 30 | 44 | 58 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 25 | 33 | 37 | 29 | 44 |
East Sussex | 35 | 30 | 39 | 45 | 40 | 52 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39 | 32 | 45 | 34 | 31 | 38 |
Enfield | 55 | 49 | 61 | 70 | 65 | 76 | 50 | 46 | 54 | 80 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 56 | 48 | 66 | 54 | 48 | 60 |
Essex | 38 | 33 | 43 | 71 | 62 | 81 | 55 | 47 | 62 | 63 | 60 | 65 | 47 | 44 | 50 | 36 | 31 | 42 |
Gateshead | 41 | 36 | 46 | 60 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | 46 | 56 | 40 | 35 | 45 |
Gloucestershire | 35 | 31 | 39 | 60 | 57 | 65 | 18 | 11 | 26 | 65 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 32 | 42 | 34 | 30 | 39 |
Greenwich | 47 | 43 | 52 | 61 | 63 | 59 | 52 | 47 | 58 | 67 | 62 | 73 | 51 | 43 | 57 | 41 | 36 | 45 |
Hackney | 53 | 48 | 56 | 61 | 60 | 63 | 49 | 38 | 57 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 51 | 49 | 53 | 53 | 52 | 55 |
Halton | 58 | 53 | 62 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 68 | 77 | 58 | 57 | 52 | 62 |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 65 | 62 | 67 | 66 | 60 | 72 | 55 | 53 | 58 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 69 | 62 | 77 | 68 | 69 | 67 |
Hampshire | 41 | 36 | 47 | 53 | 47 | 60 | 44 | 34 | 55 | 63 | 62 | 67 | 43 | 38 | 50 | 41 | 36 | 47 |
Haringey | 39 | 32 | 46 | 48 | 41 | 54 | 30 | 23 | 38 | 25 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 43 | 34 | 52 | 41 | 36 | 47 |
Harrow | 54 | 45 | 63 | 57 | 48 | 68 | 53 | 44 | 62 | 73 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 56 | 47 | 63 | 48 | 41 | 54 |
Hartlepool | 36 | 31 | 42 | 64 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 30 | 41 |
Havering | 49 | 46 | 51 | 62 | 57 | 67 | 56 | 50 | 62 | 55 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | 51 | 50 | 47 | 45 | 49 |
Herefordshire, County of | 43 | 35 | 52 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 52 | 56 | 44 | 43 | 35 | 52 |
Hertfordshire | 46 | 42 | 50 | 56 | 56 | 55 | 51 | 44 | 57 | 75 | 80 | 70 | 46 | 41 | 52 | 45 | 40 | 49 |
Hillingdon | 42 | 37 | 48 | 58 | 52 | 64 | 42 | 36 | 48 | 42 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 41 | 38 | 44 | 35 | 30 | 39 |
Hounslow | 57 | 54 | 60 | 68 | 64 | 72 | 54 | 52 | 55 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 65 | 64 | 66 | 55 | 54 | 56 |
Isle of Wight | 28 | 23 | 35 | 25 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 44 | 33 | 67 | 28 | 22 | 34 |
Isles of Scilly | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Islington | 45 | 42 | 48 | 49 | 41 | 58 | 47 | 47 | 48 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 36 | 39 | 40 | 38 | 43 |
Kensington and Chelsea | 52 | 51 | 55 | 62 | 67 | 59 | 43 | 41 | 47 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 54 | 53 | 55 | 55 | 53 | 57 |
Kent | 43 | 38 | 49 | 63 | 60 | 66 | 54 | 46 | 61 | 67 | 73 | 61 | 55 | 53 | 57 | 42 | 36 | 48 |
Kingston upon Hull, City of | 40 | 40 | 41 | 65 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 44 | 50 | 39 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 41 | 32 | 56 | 42 | 40 | 43 |
Kingston upon Thames | 61 | 60 | 61 | 75 | 75 | 74 | 45 | 42 | 50 | 70 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 64 | 66 | 64 | 56 | 54 | 57 |
Kirklees | 36 | 30 | 43 | 39 | 32 | 46 | 26 | 14 | 37 | 60 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 30 | 23 | 37 | 36 | 30 | 42 |
Knowsley | 24 | 20 | 28 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 23 | 19 | 28 |
Lambeth | 51 | 44 | 57 | 60 | 53 | 68 | 51 | 43 | 59 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 45 | 43 | 49 | 50 | 45 | 56 |
Lancashire | 33 | 29 | 38 | 36 | 29 | 43 | 32 | 38 | 24 | 41 | 25 | 56 | 34 | 25 | 42 | 33 | 29 | 38 |
Leeds | 41 | 35 | 47 | 43 | 36 | 51 | 37 | 33 | 41 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 41 | 40 | 42 | 41 | 35 | 47 |
Leicester | 32 | 28 | 37 | 43 | 36 | 49 | 31 | 26 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 29 | 26 | 31 | 19 | 16 | 22 |
Leicestershire | 32 | 27 | 37 | 51 | 42 | 61 | 21 | 15 | 29 | 55 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 28 | 45 | 30 | 25 | 34 |
Lewisham | 42 | 35 | 51 | 57 | 53 | 62 | 38 | 30 | 47 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 47 | 39 | 56 | 42 | 35 | 51 |
Lincolnshire | 44 | 39 | 48 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 44 | 33 | 56 | 76 | 79 | 71 | 55 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 43 | 38 | 48 |
Liverpool | 40 | 35 | 45 | 61 | 62 | 59 | 42 | 37 | 48 | 64 | 64 | 65 | 27 | 23 | 30 | 40 | 35 | 46 |
Luton | 33 | 35 | 31 | 43 | 49 | 38 | 35 | 38 | 33 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 25 | 22 | 28 | 24 | 25 | 24 |
Manchester | 36 | 28 | 44 | 44 | 30 | 59 | 32 | 24 | 42 | 51 | 29 | 79 | 30 | 25 | 34 | 33 | 28 | 38 |
Medway | 37 | 35 | 39 | 58 | 57 | 60 | 44 | 30 | 54 | 73 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39 | 29 | 46 | 35 | 34 | 36 |
Merton | 42 | 37 | 48 | 49 | 42 | 56 | 31 | 26 | 37 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 40 | 36 | 44 | 44 | 38 | 51 |
Middlesbrough | 20 | 15 | 25 | 22 | 16 | 26 | 27 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 25 | 18 | 29 | 20 | 15 | 25 |
Milton Keynes | 44 | 39 | 49 | 55 | 47 | 64 | 54 | 47 | 62 | 47 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 46 | 48 | 44 | 41 | 36 | 47 |
Newcastle upon Tyne | 36 | 31 | 41 | 45 | 39 | 51 | 35 | 18 | 51 | 69 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 52 | 42 | 62 | 34 | 30 | 39 |
Newham | 52 | 48 | 55 | 59 | 54 | 63 | 48 | 44 | 53 | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | 47 | 53 | 36 | 34 | 38 |
Norfolk | 36 | 30 | 42 | 51 | 39 | 61 | 43 | 33 | 58 | 48 | 50 | 46 | 35 | 28 | 43 | 35 | 30 | 42 |
North East Lincolnshire | 35 | 29 | 41 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 32 | 28 | 39 | 35 | 30 | 41 |
North Lincolnshire | 33 | 28 | 38 | 37 | 19 | 51 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 100 | N/A* | 37 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | 28 | 37 |
North Somerset | 32 | 27 | 36 | 41 | 28 | 57 | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | 41 | 53 | 31 | 27 | 35 |
North Tyneside | 38 | 33 | 43 | 45 | 33 | 50 | 73 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 51 | 53 | 50 | 37 | 32 | 42 |
North Yorkshire | 41 | 35 | 48 | 44 | 33 | 59 | 44 | 40 | 50 | 62 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 43 | 40 | 46 | 41 | 35 | 48 |
Northamptonshire | 41 | 36 | 45 | 49 | 45 | 53 | 45 | 34 | 56 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 39 | 30 | 49 | 40 | 36 | 44 |
Northumberland | 32 | 27 | 38 | 50 | 44 | 59 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | 43 | 27 | 32 | 26 | 38 |
Nottingham | 32 | 26 | 39 | 42 | 36 | 48 | 31 | 23 | 39 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 37 | 30 | 45 | 28 | 22 | 34 |
Nottinghamshire | 41 | 34 | 48 | 56 | 52 | 61 | 55 | 49 | 61 | 68 | 62 | 75 | 40 | 28 | 52 | 40 | 33 | 47 |
Oldham | 25 | 20 | 30 | 22 | 16 | 28 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 18 | 24 | 14 | 27 | 22 | 32 |
Oxfordshire | 38 | 30 | 46 | 43 | 33 | 55 | 32 | 22 | 45 | 42 | 29 | 58 | 38 | 33 | 44 | 38 | 30 | 46 |
Peterborough | 38 | 31 | 45 | 43 | 34 | 52 | 51 | 43 | 61 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 42 | 33 | 52 | 36 | 29 | 43 |
Plymouth | 40 | 32 | 48 | 72 | 75 | 69 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 62 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 49 | 39 | 56 | 39 | 31 | 47 |
Poole | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 61 | 53 | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 40 | 46 | 35 | 39 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Portsmouth | 38 | 37 | 39 | 46 | 51 | 43 | 46 | 53 | 38 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 43 | 48 | 38 | 37 | 35 | 38 |
Reading | 37 | 35 | 40 | 44 | 37 | 49 | 23 | 18 | 28 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 24 | 26 | 22 | 37 | 37 | 38 |
Redbridge | 43 | 38 | 48 | 51 | 45 | 59 | 32 | 25 | 38 | 70 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 31 | 44 | 35 | 32 | 39 |
Redcar and Cleveland | 29 | 23 | 36 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 45 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 29 | 23 | 35 |
Richmond upon Thames | 57 | 50 | 63 | 56 | 46 | 66 | 48 | 42 | 54 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 64 | 60 | 68 | 57 | 50 | 63 |
Rochdale | 26 | 21 | 32 | 37 | 25 | 48 | 37 | 32 | 41 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | 34 | 33 | 34 | 22 | 18 | 26 |
Rotherham | 31 | 24 | 38 | 21 | 10 | 31 | 50 | 35 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 38 | 33 | 44 | 32 | 25 | 38 |
Rutland | 33 | 22 | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 32 | 22 | 45 |
Salford | 46 | 40 | 51 | 55 | 43 | 71 | 47 | 49 | 46 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 46 | 44 | 49 | 45 | 39 | 51 |
Sandwell | 22 | 18 | 27 | 30 | 23 | 38 | 21 | 16 | 26 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 21 | 13 | 32 | 19 | 16 | 22 |
Sefton | 43 | 35 | 50 | 52 | 50 | 56 | 60 | 63 | 57 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 32 | 41 | 43 | 35 | 52 |
Sheffield | 39 | 33 | 46 | 39 | 30 | 50 | 38 | 32 | 44 | 61 | 57 | 64 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 39 | 34 | 45 |
Shropshire | 38 | 34 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 40 | 42 | 36 | 38 | 34 | 43 |
Slough | 42 | 39 | 45 | 46 | 43 | 48 | 27 | 24 | 31 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 40 | 33 | 39 | 34 | 43 |
Solihull | 45 | 38 | 53 | 54 | 42 | 68 | 44 | 29 | 58 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 39 | 36 | 43 | 45 | 38 | 51 |
Somerset | 36 | 30 | 41 | 44 | 28 | 60 | 29 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 55 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | 28 | 46 | 36 | 30 | 41 |
South Gloucestershire | 33 | 30 | 36 | 40 | 31 | 56 | 26 | 17 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 24 | 34 | 33 | 31 | 35 |
South Tyneside | 35 | 27 | 42 | 49 | 39 | 58 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 35 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 34 | 27 | 41 |
Southampton | 40 | 35 | 46 | 56 | 51 | 61 | 43 | 52 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 23 | 47 | 38 | 33 | 44 |
Southend-on-Sea | 42 | 38 | 46 | 70 | 65 | 79 | 62 | 59 | 66 | 68 | 67 | 70 | 44 | 39 | 49 | 37 | 33 | 42 |
Southwark | 58 | 51 | 65 | 66 | 56 | 74 | 58 | 48 | 67 | 74 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 56 | 51 | 62 | 55 | 51 | 59 |
St. Helens | 37 | 32 | 41 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 32 | 43 |
Staffordshire | 35 | 30 | 40 | 35 | 32 | 40 | 32 | 21 | 39 | 50 | 57 | 46 | 34 | 23 | 43 | 35 | 30 | 40 |
Stockport | 46 | 42 | 51 | 57 | 47 | 68 | 38 | 29 | 57 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 48 | 41 | 57 | 46 | 42 | 49 |
Stockton-on-Tees | 40 | 34 | 48 | 43 | 28 | 58 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 38 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 44 | 38 | 56 | 40 | 34 | 46 |
Stoke-on-Trent | 28 | 23 | 33 | 33 | 26 | 40 | 38 | 31 | 46 | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 22 | 19 | 24 | 27 | 23 | 31 |
Suffolk | 30 | 27 | 34 | 46 | 43 | 49 | 25 | 12 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 33 | 33 | 33 | 30 | 26 | 34 |
Sunderland | 37 | 26 | 48 | 57 | 32 | 71 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | N/A* | 100 | 56 | 25 | 80 | 36 | 26 | 47 |
Surrey | 46 | 40 | 52 | 52 | 46 | 58 | 49 | 41 | 60 | 75 | 72 | 79 | 48 | 43 | 53 | 45 | 40 | 51 |
Sutton | 56 | 50 | 62 | 82 | 77 | 87 | 64 | 59 | 68 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 62 | 57 | 67 | 44 | 39 | 51 |
Swindon | 33 | 29 | 37 | 48 | 43 | 53 | 36 | 38 | 33 | 40 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 30 | 28 | 32 | 31 | 27 | 35 |
Tameside | 31 | 25 | 37 | 35 | 25 | 45 | 29 | 24 | 33 | 42 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 34 | 21 | 31 | 25 | 36 |
Telford and Wrekin | 46 | 41 | 52 | 50 | 46 | 56 | 39 | 33 | 47 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | 42 | 53 | 46 | 41 | 52 |
Thurrock | 42 | 37 | 46 | 55 | 40 | 69 | 51 | 47 | 54 | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 51 | 47 | 55 | 40 | 36 | 44 |
Torbay | 32 | 31 | 33 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 43 | 50 | 36 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 32 | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Tower Hamlets | 46 | 45 | 47 | 53 | 52 | 54 | 44 | 41 | 46 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 28 | 30 | 26 | 29 | 28 | 31 |
Trafford | 47 | 42 | 51 | 46 | 37 | 56 | 36 | 28 | 44 | 71 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | 44 | 56 | 46 | 43 | 50 |
Wakefield | 33 | 26 | 40 | 40 | 26 | 52 | 21 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 34 | 26 | 41 | 33 | 27 | 40 |
Walsall | 36 | 32 | 40 | 45 | 44 | 48 | 37 | 27 | 50 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 34 | 29 | 39 | 33 | 29 | 37 |
Waltham Forest | 39 | 29 | 50 | 46 | 30 | 63 | 32 | 22 | 41 | 32 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 37 | 32 | 42 | 39 | 31 | 47 |
Wandsworth | 58 | 50 | 68 | 70 | 64 | 78 | 53 | 41 | 66 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 55 | 44 | 68 | 56 | 49 | 64 |
Warrington | 38 | 34 | 41 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 43 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 34 | 20 | 53 | 37 | 34 | 41 |
Warwickshire | 42 | 37 | 48 | 54 | 45 | 62 | 32 | 14 | 45 | 63 | 40 | 100 | 46 | 47 | 45 | 41 | 36 | 47 |
West Berkshire | 48 | 44 | 52 | 54 | 48 | 62 | 32 | 39 | 25 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | 39 | 52 | 49 | 45 | 52 |
West Sussex | 41 | 35 | 47 | 51 | 41 | 62 | 34 | 28 | 41 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 47 | 39 | 54 | 41 | 35 | 46 |
Westminster | 49 | 37 | 59 | 45 | 39 | 53 | 44 | 32 | 58 | 61 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 49 | 36 | 60 | 56 | 39 | 68 |
Wigan | 34 | 27 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 69 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 36 | 26 | 44 | 33 | 27 | 40 |
Wiltshire | 42 | 38 | 45 | 43 | 46 | 39 | 40 | 27 | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 52 | 53 | 52 | 41 | 37 | 45 |
Windsor and Maidenhead | 44 | 37 | 52 | 47 | 28 | 66 | 35 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 52 | 56 | 47 | 43 | 37 | 50 |
Wirral | 50 | 47 | 52 | 67 | 78 | 61 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 52 | 47 | 57 | 49 | 46 | 52 |
Wokingham | 53 | 45 | 63 | 57 | 51 | 70 | 47 | 41 | 53 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 48 | 37 | 65 | 53 | 45 | 62 |
Wolverhampton | 26 | 18 | 33 | 40 | 30 | 50 | 20 | 19 | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 20 | 11 | 28 | 22 | 15 | 29 |
Worcestershire | 39 | 35 | 43 | 27 | 15 | 39 | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 40 | 36 | 46 | 40 | 36 | 44 |
York | 56 | 52 | 61 | 73 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 67 | 53 | 81 | 56 | 52 | 60 |
Download table data for ‘ EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and area’ (CSV) Source data for ‘ EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and area’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and area Summary
The data shows that:
-
overall, a higher percentage of girls entered the EBacc than boys in every local authority, except for Luton, where 35% of boys entered compared to 31% of girls
-
the local authorities with the biggest gap between girls and boys in Ebacc entry were as follows: Westminster for White pupils (29 percentage points); Calderdale for Black pupils (38 percentage points); Sunderland for Asian pupils (39 percentage points); Warwickshire for Chinese pupils (60 percentage points); and Sunderland for Mixed race pupils (55 percentage points)
-
please be aware the statistics quoted here for EBacc entry by ethnic group, gender and local authority are based on small numbers of pupils and are highly variable over time
8. EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and basis for school admission
All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Admissions basis | All All | All Boys | All Girls | Asian All | Asian Boys | Asian Girls | Black All | Black Boys | Black Girls | Chinese All | Chinese Boys | Chinese Girls | Mixed All | Mixed Boys | Mixed Girls | White All | White Boys | White Girls |
All state-funded mainstream schools | 40 | 35 | 46 | 48 | 42 | 54 | 44 | 37 | 51 | 63 | 57 | 70 | 43 | 38 | 48 | 39 | 34 | 44 |
Non-selective schools in highly selective areas | 28 | 24 | 33 | 30 | 24 | 36 | 38 | 28 | 47 | 46 | 48 | 44 | 30 | 26 | 34 | 28 | 23 | 32 |
Non-selective schools in other areas (inc. low selective areas) | 39 | 34 | 45 | 46 | 39 | 53 | 43 | 36 | 50 | 59 | 51 | 67 | 42 | 36 | 47 | 38 | 33 | 43 |
Selective schools | 83 | 82 | 85 | 85 | 82 | 89 | 84 | 80 | 88 | 86 | 84 | 89 | 86 | 85 | 86 | 83 | 82 | 84 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and basis for school admission’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and basis for school admission’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and basis for school admission Summary
This data groups schools by type into the following 3 categories, according to whether they select their pupils by ability:
- selective schools
- non-selective schools in highly selective areas (where 25% or more of state-funded secondary places are in state-funded selective schools)
- all other non-selective schools (including schools in local authorities with some selection, as well as those with no selection)
The data shows that:
-
in 2015/16, there were 22,512 key stage 4 pupils (4%) in selective schools, 34,658 (7%) in non-selective schools in highly selective areas, and 472,525 (89%) in non-selective schools in other areas
-
a higher percentage of girls than boys entered the EBacc across almost all admissions types and ethnic groups
-
Chinese pupils in non-selective schools in highly selective areas were the exception: here, more Chinese boys than girls entered
-
Chinese and Asian girls in selective schools were most likely to enter the EBacc – 89% did so
-
White boys in non-selective schools in highly selective areas were less likely to enter the EBacc than either girls or boys from any other ethnic group – 23% did so
-
Black pupils in non-selective schools in highly selective areas showed the biggest difference between girls and boys for EBacc entry, at 19 percentage points
9. EBacc entry by ethnicity and type of school
All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
School Type | All Pupils | All % | Asian Pupils | Asian % | Black Pupils | Black % | Chinese Pupils | Chinese % | Mixed Pupils | Mixed % | White Pupils | White % |
All state-funded mainstream schools | 530,580 | 40 | 50,515 | 48 | 27,407 | 44 | 2,008 | 63 | 22,465 | 43 | 414,528 | 39 |
Local authority maintained mainstream schools | 191,701 | 39 | 21,499 | 44 | 11,496 | 42 | 591 | 59 | 8,130 | 40 | 145,402 | 37 |
Academies and free schools | 337,452 | 42 | 28,983 | 51 | 15,874 | 45 | 1,416 | 65 | 14,288 | 45 | 268,711 | 40 |
Sponsored academies | 85,080 | 30 | 7,419 | 40 | 6,173 | 41 | 277 | 54 | 3,759 | 36 | 64,925 | 27 |
Converter academies | 247,551 | 46 | 20,958 | 55 | 9,482 | 48 | 1,127 | 68 | 10,292 | 49 | 200,260 | 45 |
Free schools | 1,838 | 50 | 411 | 74 | 60 | 28 | 8 | 50 | 79 | 53 | 1,187 | 43 |
University technical colleges | 1,864 | 12 | 125 | 9 | 130 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 108 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 1,412 | 13 |
Studio schools | 1,119 | 5 | 70 | 6 | 29 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 927 | 4 |
Further education colleges with provision for 14- to 16-year-olds | 885 | 3 | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* |
State-funded special schools | 10,109 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 703 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 517 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 18 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 403 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 8,235 | 0 |
All state-funded schools | 540,689 | 40 | 51,218 | 47 | 27,924 | 43 | 2,026 | 63 | 22,868 | 42 | 422,763 | 38 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and type of school’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity and type of school’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity and type of school Summary
The data shows that:
-
35% of pupils were in local authority maintained mainstream schools, 62% were in academies and free schools, 2% were in state-funded special schools and 0.2% in further education colleges in 2015/16
-
Chinese pupils were most likely to enter the EBacc, in both local authority-maintained mainstream schools, and academies or free schools; an average of 59% and 65% did so respectively at these types of school
-
White pupils were least likely to to enter the EBacc, in both local authority-maintained mainstream schools, and academies or free schools; an average of 37% and 40% did so respectively at these types of school
10. EBacc entry by ethnicity, special education needs (SEN) and gender
All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEN | All All | All Boys | All Girls | Asian All | Asian Boys | Asian Girls | Black All | Black Boys | Black Girls | Chinese All | Chinese Boys | Chinese Girls | Mixed All | Mixed Boys | Mixed Girls | White All | White Boys | White Girls |
All SEN | 12 | 10 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 19 | 17 | 13 | 22 | 21 | 18 | 25 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 14 |
No identified SEN | 45 | 40 | 49 | 51 | 45 | 57 | 48 | 41 | 54 | 66 | 59 | 72 | 47 | 43 | 51 | 43 | 39 | 47 |
SEN Support | 15 | 13 | 18 | 19 | 16 | 23 | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 21 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 18 | 16 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 16 |
SEN with a statement or EHC plan | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 20 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, special education needs (SEN) and gender’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, special education needs (SEN) and gender’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity, special education needs (SEN) and gender Summary
Pupils with special education needs (SEN) have learning difficulties or disabilities that make it harder for them to learn than most children of the same age.
Since 2015, pupils have been categorised as follows:
- no identified SEN
- SEN support: extra or different help is given from that provided as part of the school's usual curriculum, and the class teacher and SEN coordinator (SENCO) may receive advice or support from outside specialists
- SEN statement or education, health and care (EHC) plan: a pupil is given a SEN statement or an EHC plan once a formal assessment has been made
‘All SEN pupils’ refers to the total number of pupils with either SEN support, a SEN statement or an EHC plan.
The data shows that:
-
in 2015/16, there were 78,682 pupils at the end of key stage 4 with SEN: 80% were White, 7% were Asian, 6% were Black, 4% were Mixed and 0.2% were Chinese
-
of the total 78,682 SEN students, 58,279 had SEN support and 20,403 had SEN with a statement or EHC plan
-
of all SEN pupils, Chinese pupils were the most likely to enter the EBacc (21%), while White pupils were the least likely (11%)
-
of all SEN pupils, the largest difference between boys and girls, at 9 percentage points, was found among Black pupils: 22% of girls entered the EBacc, compared to 13% of boys
11. EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and religion of school
All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Religious character | All All | All Boys | All Girls | Asian All | Asian Boys | Asian Girls | Black All | Black Boys | Black Girls | Chinese All | Chinese Boys | Chinese Girls | Mixed All | Mixed Boys | Mixed Girls | White All | White Boys | White Girls |
All state-funded mainstream schools | 40 | 35 | 46 | 48 | 42 | 54 | 44 | 37 | 51 | 63 | 57 | 70 | 43 | 38 | 48 | 39 | 34 | 44 |
Church of England schools | 42 | 38 | 46 | 49 | 46 | 53 | 47 | 41 | 54 | 65 | 64 | 67 | 45 | 41 | 48 | 41 | 37 | 45 |
Jewish schools | 51 | 54 | 49 | 60 | 55 | 65 | 69 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 48 | 50 | 47 | 46 | 50 | 43 |
Muslim schools | 68 | 60 | 71 | 69 | 60 | 73 | 59 | 60 | 58 | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 56 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality |
No religious character | 40 | 35 | 45 | 47 | 41 | 54 | 43 | 35 | 50 | 64 | 57 | 71 | 42 | 37 | 48 | 38 | 33 | 43 |
Other Christian faith schools | 40 | 37 | 44 | 52 | 48 | 57 | 36 | 31 | 44 | 61 | 49 | 77 | 45 | 44 | 46 | 39 | 36 | 43 |
Roman Catholic schools | 45 | 39 | 50 | 47 | 40 | 55 | 48 | 43 | 52 | 57 | 44 | 67 | 46 | 41 | 50 | 44 | 38 | 49 |
Sikh school | 78 | 82 | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Download table data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and religion of school’ (CSV) Source data for ‘EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and religion of school’ (CSV)
Summary of English Baccalaureate (EBacc) entry for children aged 14 to 16 (key stage 4) EBacc entry by ethnicity, gender and religion of school Summary
This data divides schools into the following religious categories:
- no religious character
- Church of England schools
- Roman Catholic schools
- Other Christian faith schools (including those of mixed denomination or other Christian beliefs, for example, Greek Orthodox)
- Jewish schools
- Muslim schools
- Sikh schools
The data shows that:
-
in 2015/16, out of all key stage 4 pupils in state-funded mainstream schools in England, 530,580 were considered for the Ebacc
-
78% of those considered were White, 10% were Asian, 5% were Black, 4% were Mixed, and 0.4% were Chinese
-
82% of pupils attended schools with no religious character, 6% attended Church of England schools, 10% attended Roman Catholic schools, 2% attended Other Christian faith schools, 0.2% attended Jewish, 0.1% attended Muslim and 0.03% attended Sikh schools
-
Sikh schools had the highest percentage of pupils entering the EBacc (78%)
-
overall, the lowest percentage of pupils entering the EBacc, at 40% was at schools of no religious character - 65% of pupils in these schools were White
-
Chinese girls at Other Christian faith schools were the most likely group to enter the EBacc (77%)
-
Black boys at Other Christian faith schools were the least likely group to enter the EBacc (31%)
12. Methodology
The key stage 4 datasets are compiled using information matched together from 3 data sources:
- prior attainment records (key stage 2 results)
- school census records
- qualification entries and results collected from awarding bodies
Key stage 4 data received from awarding bodies is combined with pupil characteristics from the school census and prior attainment by the department’s contractor.
Records are matched, using identifiers such as surname, forename, date of birth, unique pupil number (UPN), gender and postcode. This successfully matches around 98% of results.
The statistics in this commission cover the data collated for the 2016 secondary school performance tables. The performance tables and the related statistical first release report results are based on pupils at the end of key stage 4, who are typically aged 15 at the start of the academic year.
The coverage of the local authority (LA) and regional statistics is state-funded schools only in England. This includes city technology colleges and academies but excludes hospital schools, pupil referral units and alternative provision.
Pupils are included in the figures for FSM if their families have claimed eligibility for FSM at the time of the annual spring school census. This FSM definition includes all who were eligible to receive free school meals, not only those who actually received free school meals. Pupils not eligible for free school meals or unclassified pupils are described as ‘All other pupils’.
Parents are able to claim FSM if they receive a qualifying benefit.
FSM is used as an indicator of disadvantage, but when drawing conclusions, it should be remembered that not all eligible parents apply for FSM and families who don’t quite reach the eligibility threshold for FSM may still be suffering deprivation.
Suppression rules and disclosure control
Values of 1 or 2, or a percentage based on 1 or 2 pupils who achieved; or 0, 1 or 2 pupils who did not achieve a particular level are suppressed in circumstances where non-suppression would lead to disclosure of pupils.
Some additional figures have been suppressed to prevent the possibility of a suppressed figure being revealed.
This suppression is consistent with our Statistical policy statement on confidentiality.
Schools are able to apply for pupils to be removed from their figures, if they have recently arrived from overseas and their first language is not English. We allow the removal of these pupils from the school and local authority figures as they can have an impact on some schools’ figures (since some schools have significant numbers of such pupils). However, we continue to include these pupils in the national figures so that they reflect the attainment of all pupils. Schools can also apply for pupils to be removed if a pupil has been admitted following a permanent exclusion from another school, if the pupil is not at the end of key stage 4, if the pupil has permanently left England, or the pupil is deceased. It may not be appropriate for schools to be held accountable for these pupils and therefore with adequate evidence we allow the removal of them so they are not included in the school's performance measures The Code of Practice for Official Statistics requires DfE to take reasonable steps to ensure that their published or disseminated statistics protect confidentiality.
For more information about DfE’s disclosure control procedures for its statistical releases please see [DfE’s statistical policy statement on confidentiality]
Rounding
Percentages in the tables and charts are given to nearest whole number and are given to one decimal place in the downloads.
Quality and methodology information
13. Data sources
Source
Revised GCSE and equivalent results in England: 2015 to 2016
Type of data
Administrative data
Type of statistic
National Statistics
Publisher
Department for Education
Publication frequency
Yearly
Purpose of data source
The main purpose is to measure schools and pupil performance at key stage 4 (GCSE) to monitor and improve standards and inform parental choice.
14. Download the data
This file contains the following: ethnicity, year, gender, FSM, admissions basis, type of school, SEN, religious character, value and denominator
This file contains the following: ethnicity, year, local authority, gender, value and denominator