Former Prime Minister Theresa May announced the Race Disparity Audit in August 2016.

The aim of the project was to gather and publish data collected by government about the different experiences of the UK’s ethnic groups.

The Race Disparity Audit was published in October 2017. Data from the audit is continually updated on the Ethnicity facts and figures website.

Below, we explain:

  • who our users are
  • how the project was carried out
  • the underlying principles and goals that guided it

Understanding users

In order to be sure that the project would deliver value, hundreds of users have been interviewed or involved in user research since the start. It was important to understand who our users are, their different needs, how those needs might already be met elsewhere, and which of their problems could be solved by Ethnicity facts and figures.

The groups of users included:

  • members of the public from diverse backgrounds and ethnicities
  • government policy officials and analysts
  • NGOs
  • academics
  • public service managers (for example, headteachers and Jobcentre managers)

The needs of users vary a great deal, as does their understanding of statistical data. For this reason, the content of the website had to be clear and meaningful for people who aren’t experts in statistics and data. The website also had to be accessible, so that people with disabilities could use the service. Users with more expertise in statistics needed access to the raw data itself and more detailed background information about how it was collected and analysed.

Trust was an important factor across the different user groups. They all wanted to feel confident that the information on the website was reliable and impartial, and presented in a way that was of value to the public.

Users came from a variety of ethnic backgrounds, locations and demographic profiles to reflect the diversity of the website’s user base.

Principles and good practice

There are well-established principles, standards and practices for working on data and statistics, and for delivering digital services. These helped the team produce work of a high quality that could be trusted and understood by users.

The UK Statistics Authority Code of Practice sets out the necessary principles and practices to produce statistics that are trustworthy, high quality and of public value.

The Digital Service Standard is a set of 18 criteria to help government create and run good digital services. All public-facing transactional services must meet the standard. It is used by government departments and the Government Digital Service to check whether a service is good enough for public use.

The Office of National Statistics (ONS) style guide provides guidance on writing about statistics and visualising data. The GOV.UK style guide covers style, spelling and grammar conventions for all content published on GOV.UK. Both of these guides help keep the content of the website consistent, clear, concise and correct.

Consultation and engagement

In order to benefit from good practice, expertise and rigorous public consultation and testing, the project has engaged users and stakeholders in co-designing the programme.

For example, we used the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)’s measurement framework as a reference point for the structure of Ethnicity facts and figures.

The EHRC framework monitors progress on equality and human rights in England, Scotland and Wales and and is organised into broad subject areas, or ‘domains’, indicators and measures of equality.

The Ethnicity facts and figures framework has a similar structure in the form of topics, sub-topics and measures:

  • important aspects of life in the UK (for example, health, education and housing) are organised into topics
  • sub-topics group together similar subject areas within a topic (for example, patient experiences and patient outcomes under health)
  • measures capture specific facts and figures relating to a subject area (for example, GP services, dental services and hospital care under patient experiences)

This structure has been thoroughly tested to check that users can navigate it easily and find the content they are looking for.

Project phases


The initial review asked all government departments to identify what information on ethnicity they held on important aspects of life in the UK (for example, health, education, work and housing). Devolved administrations were asked to participate and share their data in order to provide a UK-wide picture, a discussion that is ongoing.

This means that:

  • local authority data is not included unless it is also available from a central department (for example, the Department for Education provides school data in England at a local level)
  • Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland data is included in areas that are not devolved (for example, the Home Office reports on victims of crime across the UK)


During this initial review, government departments identified a vast amount of data which it was not possible to collect and publish in the time we had available.

So the team, in consultation with the departments and drawing on user research, agreed a set of criteria to shorten the list for the first release. The agreed prioritisation criteria were:

  • does the dataset relate to a government priority?
  • has it been identified by future users of the website as a priority for them?
  • how much work is involved in preparing the data for publication?


Based on Cabinet Office user research, data expertise and ONS’s existing good publishing practice, a format for collecting content from departments for each measure was established.

The data held by different departments varies greatly in size, consistency and quality. There is limited standardisation, and classification of the different ethnicities can differ widely depending on how data was collected, when and by whom. A common format was needed to ensure trust, quality and value across the content presented on the website. Each measure, which relates to an individual web page, is built of a combination of 2 file templates:

  • a data format file, used to populate charts and tables
  • commentary, which explains the facts and figures displayed, and provides caveats, technical details and information on how the data was collected

Government departments returned these files for each of the prioritised measures. The measures then went through additional checks to ensure their quality and consistency, before being uploaded to the site.


The Ethnicity facts and figures website was developed based on extensive user research and the government’s Digital Service Standard. This work has been undertaken in 3 stages:

  • discovery: understand the project scope and identify users
  • alpha: prototype the website, refine user needs and identify the technology and skills needed
  • beta: build the platform and continue testing extensively with users

Ethnicity facts and figures has been reviewed by experts by means of service assessments to check it meets the required standards. This rigorous approach ensures a government service is good enough for public use and meets user needs.

Future changes

More measures will be added to the website over time: these will consist of new measures as well as updates to those already published.

The website will continue to be updated based on user feedback and what we learn after launch. Any feedback or queries should be sent to