Last updated 17 May 2019 - see all updates
There is a new version of this page. View the latest version.
- 1. Navigate to Main facts and figures section
- 2. Navigate toBy ethnicity and type of support (all state support) section
- 3. Navigate toBy ethnicity and type of benefit (non-income related benefits) section
- 4. Navigate toBy ethnicity (income-related benefits) section
- 5. Navigate toBy ethnicity (Jobseeker's Allowance, or Employment and Support Allowance) section
- 6. Navigate toBy ethnicity (tax credits only) section
- 7. Navigate toBy ethnicity over time (all state support) section
- 8. Navigate to Methodology section
- 9. Navigate to Data sources section
- 10. Navigate to Download the data section
1. Main facts and figures
- between 2014/15 and 2016/17, 56% of family units in the UK received some type of state support on average – a ‘family unit’ in this data is a single adult or a married or cohabiting couple plus any dependent children
- White British family units were the most likely out of all ethnic groups to receive state support (of any type) and Chinese family units were the least likely to
- White British family units were also the most likely out of all ethnic groups to receive non-income related benefits (which include the State Pension and Child Benefit)
- family units in the Bangladeshi, Black, Mixed, Pakistani, and Other ethnic groups were the most likely out of all ethnic groups to receive income-related benefits and tax credits
- since 2009/10, the percentage of family units receiving any type of state support has declined for all ethnic groups apart from the Bangladeshi and Chinese groups
The ethnic categories used in this data
This data uses the ethnic categories included in the Family Resources Survey. It also divides the White ethnic group into White British and 'White Other' (for White ethnic minorities).
The categories are as follows:
Asian/ Asian British:
- Asian Other
Mixed/ Multiple ethnic groups
- White British
- White Other
2. By ethnicity and type of support (all state support)
|Ethnicity||Any income-related benefit||Any non-income related benefit||Any type of state support||Any type of tax credit|
Summary of State support By ethnicity and type of support (all state support) Summary
3. By ethnicity and type of benefit (non-income related benefits)
|Ethnicity||Child Benefit||Disability Living Allowance (care component)||Disability Living Allowance (mobility component)||State Pension|
|Chinese||17||not collected||not collected||8|
Summary of State support By ethnicity and type of benefit (non-income related benefits) Summary
4. By ethnicity (income-related benefits)
|Ethnicity||Council Tax Reduction||Housing Benefit||Income Support||Pension Credit|
Summary of State support By ethnicity (income-related benefits) Summary
5. By ethnicity (Jobseeker's Allowance, or Employment and Support Allowance)
|Ethnicity||Employment and Support Allowance||Jobseeker's Allowance|
Download table data for ‘By ethnicity (Jobseeker's Allowance, or Employment and Support Allowance)’ (CSV) Source data for ‘By ethnicity (Jobseeker's Allowance, or Employment and Support Allowance)’ (CSV)
Summary of State support By ethnicity (Jobseeker's Allowance, or Employment and Support Allowance) Summary
6. By ethnicity (tax credits only)
|Ethnicity||Child Tax Credit||Working Tax Credit|
Summary of State support By ethnicity (tax credits only) Summary
7. By ethnicity over time (all state support)
Summary of State support By ethnicity over time (all state support) Summary
The Family Resources Survey (FRS) is a continuous household survey which collects information on a representative sample of private households in the UK. Detailed information is recorded on respondents’ income from all sources:
- housing tenure
- caring needs and responsibilities
- spending on housing
- pension scheme participation
- family circumstances
- child maintenance
The survey is conducted in respondents’ homes. In the latest 3-year period, 2014/15 to 2016/17, the FRS sample consisted of just over 58,000 households in the UK. It has a financial-year survey period with surveys conducted throughout the year and is cross-sectional (a ‘snapshot’ of households over the year). Individuals are not followed up for later surveys.
Estimates are subject to sampling error and non-sampling bias. The FRS only covers private households. Therefore, individuals who live in communal accommodation like care homes or have no fixed address (for example, who are homeless) are not included in these results.
Households where every resident aged 16 years and over responds to the questions are classed as fully co-operating. Only households with full co-operation are included in the analysis. This may introduce some error, as the characteristics of individuals living in households which do not respond fully may be different to those who fully co-operate. Therefore, the sample will be more representative of those who do respond fully. Overall, 54% of households fully co-operated with the survey, meaning there was a sample size of 19,387 households in 2016/17.
Results derived from a low number of responses are more likely to be affected by statistical variation, so observed changes might not reflect real differences. As such, caution is needed when interpreting short-term trends in the data, especially for subgroups (for example, a specific ethnic group, age group and gender). Using a 3-year average for income minimises the risks due to uncertainty.
As the data is presented as a 3-year average, no statistical tests have been carried out to determine whether the estimates taken from the survey are statistically significantly different from one another.
In other words, as the results are based on a sample of the population, without further testing it isn’t possible to determine whether any differences observed would likely be seen across the entire population. This means that conclusions about differences between groups cannot be drawn. However, the data is still useful because it indicates where differences between ethnic groups might exist.
Weighting is used to adjust the results of a survey to make them representative of the population and improve their accuracy.
For example, a survey which contains 25% women and 75% men will not accurately reflect the views of the general population, which we know has an even 50/50 split.
Statisticians rebalance or ‘weight’ the survey results to more accurately represent the general population. This helps to make them more reliable.
Survey weights are usually applied to make sure the survey sample has broadly the same gender, age, ethnic and geographic make up as the general population.
Suppression rules and disclosure control
Any values based on fewer than 100 responses have been suppressed.
Percentages are given to the nearest whole percentage point. Due to this rounding, some figures may not add up.
Family Resources Survey with previous years' data and background information.
9. Data sources
Type of data
Type of statistic
Department for Work and Pensions
Purpose of data source
The Family Resources Survey is mainly used by the Department for Work and Pensions to develop and evaluate social welfare policy.
10. Download the data
This file contains data for the 3-year period 2009/10 to 2016/17. This is the latest data available. This file contains: measure, ethnicity, year, value