Influencing local decisions
Published
This page has been archived.
It has been replaced by
Local decisions.
There is a new version of this page. View the latest version.
1. Main facts and figures
-
in 2016/17, just over a quarter of people felt they could influence decisions affecting their local area
-
respondents from Black, Asian and Mixed ethnic groups were more likely to feel they had an influence than White respondents
Things you need to know
The Community Life Survey (previously the Citizenship Survey) is a ‘sample survey’: it collects information from a random sample of the population to make generalisations (reach 'findings’) about the total population.
Keep in mind when making comparisons between ethnic groups that all survey estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty, as they are based on a sample of the population. The degree of uncertainty is greater when the number of respondents is small, so it will be highest for ethnic minority groups.
The commentary only refers to differences between groups where they are 'statistically significant'. Findings are statistically significant when we can be confident that they can be repeated, and are reflective of the total population rather than just the survey sample.
Specifically, the statistical tests used mean we can be confident that if we carried out the same survey on different random samples of the population, 19 times out of 20 we would get similar findings.
What the data measures
This data measures the percentage of people who felt they could influence decisions affecting their local area. The data is broken down by ethnicity.
The data shows people who, when asked, said they ‘definitely agreed’ or ‘tended to agree’ that they had influence.
The ethnic categories used in this data
For this data, the number of people surveyed (the ‘sample size’) was too small to draw any firm conclusions about specific ethnic categories.
Therefore, the data is broken down into the following 5 broad groups:
- Asian
- Black
- Mixed
- White
- Other
2. People who think they can influence local decisions, by ethnicity
| Ethnicity | % | Respondents |
|---|---|---|
| All | 27 | 10,014 |
| Asian | 37 | 1,086 |
| Black | 44 | 349 |
| Mixed | 37 | 446 |
| White | 25 | 7,854 |
| Other | 34 | 158 |
Download table data for ‘People who think they can influence local decisions, by ethnicity’ (CSV) Source data for ‘People who think they can influence local decisions, by ethnicity’ (CSV)
Summary of Influencing local decisions People who think they can influence local decisions, by ethnicity Summary
-
in 2016/17, just over a quarter of people (27%) felt they could influence decisions affecting their local area
-
25% of White respondents felt they had an influence, compared with 44% of Black respondents, 37% of both Asian respondents and those with Mixed ethnicity, and 34% of respondents from the Other ethnic group
-
the low number of survey responses from Black and Mixed ethnicity respondents, and those from the Other ethnic group, means that generalisations about these groups are less reliable
3. Methodology
The Community Life Survey is a survey of households in England. It is carried out through questionnaires that respondents complete online or on paper. The 2016/17 survey consisted of a sample size of 10,256 individuals.
The survey has deliberately surveyed more households from ethnic minority groups, excluding White ethnic minorities. This is because the smaller populations of these groups would otherwise give less reliable results.
The results for this sample have been weighted to be representative of the population of England in terms of age, gender, degree level education, housing tenure, region, household size and ethnic group. This helped to compensate for any differences between people who were more likely to respond to the survey and those less likely to. It also took account of the over-sampling in any national estimates.
In 2016/17, the survey moved from face-to-face to online/paper data collection. This change in data collection method means results for 2016/17 are not comparable with results for earlier years.
The 2016/17 survey sample is large enough for the results to be broken down by the broad ethnic groups. In previous years, sample sizes for this survey were conducted face-to-face, and in more recent years they had considerably smaller sample sizes.
The smaller samples sizes meant it was only possible to compare ethnic groups at a very high level, comparing White adults with adults of all other ethnic groups. In the most recent survey years, sample sizes were anywhere from 2,000 to 3,000 respondents, which was too small for reliable conclusions about differences between the White and Other ethnic groups. For these reasons, results for 2016/17 are not being compared with those from previous surveys. For earlier years, results for ‘White’ and ‘Other’ are available in the published tables in the series of releases for the Community Life Survey.
Suppression rules and disclosure control
Results aren’t published if they’re based on fewer than 30 responses. The results in this data are based on sample sizes of over 100 respondents.
Rounding
Estimates in the charts and tables are given to the nearest percentage but more detailed estimates to 1 decimal place are available in the download.
Quality and methodology information
4. Data sources
Source
Type of data
Survey data
Type of statistic
Official statistics
Publisher
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Publication frequency
Yearly
Purpose of data source
The Community Life Survey tracks developments in areas that are important to encouraging social action and empowering communities.
These include:
- volunteering and charitable giving
- neighbourhood (views about the local area, community cohesion and belonging)
- civic engagement and social action
- well-being
5. Download the data
This file contains the following: ethnicity, year