Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 (key stage 2)
Published
This page has been archived.
It has been replaced by
School results for 10 to 11 year olds.
There is a new version of this page. View the latest version.
- 1. Navigate to Main facts and figures section
- 2. Navigate toGrammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity section
- 3. Navigate toGrammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and area section
- 4. Navigate toGrammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and gender section
- 5. Navigate to Methodology section
- 6. Navigate to Data sources section
- 7. Navigate to Download the data section
1. Main facts and figures
- overall, in 2016/17, 77% of pupils met the expected standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling by the end of key stage 2 (when they are usually aged 10 or 11 years) and 31% of pupils met the higher standard
- pupils from the Chinese and Indian ethnic groups were the most likely to meet the expected standard, out of all ethnic groups; pupils from the Chinese group were also most likely to meet the higher standard
- Gypsy/Roma pupils were least likely to meet both the expected and higher standards
- across all ethnic groups, girls were more likely than boys to meet both the expected and higher standards
- Chinese and Indian girls had the highest average scaled score, at 111 (5 points higher than the overall average of 106)
- Gypsy/Roma and Traveller of Irish heritage boys had the lowest average scaled score, at 95 and 97 respectively
Things you need to know
In 2016/17, there were 599,694 pupils in key stage 2 at state-funded schools in England, and ethnicity was known for 594,381 (99%) of them.
Of those whose ethnicity was known, 75% were White, 11% were Asian, 6% were Black, 6% were Mixed, 2% were from the Other ethnic group and 0.4% were Chinese.
The Department for Education (DfE) has excluded, or ‘suppressed’, very small numbers (for example, values of 1 or 2, a percentage based on 1 or 2 pupils who achieved, or 0, 1 or 2 pupils who did not achieve a particular standard).
This is because, where the size of the ethnic group population is small enough that an individual’s identity could be revealed, information is suppressed to preserve confidentiality. This is consistent with DfE’s statistical policy statement on confidentiality (PDF opens in a new window or tab) (PDF).
Pupil numbers for key stage 2 vary between measures of attainment for different subjects. This is because pupils who don't have a valid result for a particular subject are excluded from the total. For more about valid test results, see the Methodology section.
What the data measures
This data measures the grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment of children at the end of key stage 2 (year 6), when children are aged 10 to 11 years.
The data covers the academic year 2016/17 (September 2016 to July 2017). Data for the academic year 2015/16 is available in the download file.
The standards are divided in 2 categories:
- expected standard – to meet this, pupils must have achieved a ‘scaled score’ of 100 or more in their grammar, punctuation and spelling tests
- higher standard – to meet this, pupils must have achieved a ‘scaled score’ of 110 or more in their grammar, punctuation and spelling tests
The average scaled score measures the average attainment of pupils in key stage 2 grammar, punctuation and spelling tests. Results range from 80 to 120. A scaled score allows for variations in test difficulty year on year by standardising each pupil’s test results. This allows a clearer comparison between years. You can read more about scaled scores at key stage 2.
The ethnic categories used in this data
This data uses categories from the Department for Education’s school census, which is broadly based on the 2001 national Census, with 3 exceptions:
- Traveller of Irish Heritage and Gypsy/Roma children have been separated into 2 categories
- Sri Lankan has been added to the Asian/Asian British group but is not reported separately
- Chinese pupils have been assigned a separate category
These changes were made after consultations with local authorities and lobby groups.
The categories in the school census are as follows:
Asian/Asian British:
- Indian
- Pakistani
- Bangladeshi
- Sri Lankan
- Other Asian background
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British:
- Black African
- Black Caribbean
- Other Black background
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups:
- White and Black Caribbean
- White and Black African
- White and Asian
- Other Mixed background
White:
- White British
- White Irish
- Traveller of Irish Heritage
- Gypsy/Roma
- Other White
Chinese Other ethnic group
Information is provided for both detailed and broad ethnic groups where possible and when the data is available.
The 6 broad categories used are as follows:
- Asian/Asian British
- Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
- Chinese
- Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups
- White
- Other ethnic group
However, local authority data is only provided for 5 broad ethnic groups. Information about the specific ethnic categories is excluded to preserve confidentiality and ensure individuals cannot be identified. Information about the Other ethnic group is not given because DfE does not publish data for this group at the local authority level.
The 5 broad categories are as follows:
- Asian/Asian British
- Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
- Chinese
- Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups
- White
2. Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity
Ethnicity | Expected standard | Higher standard | Average scaled score |
---|---|---|---|
All | 77 | 31 | 106 |
Asian | 84 | 43 | 108 |
Bangladeshi | 85 | 44 | 109 |
Indian | 88 | 52 | 110 |
Pakistani | 80 | 35 | 107 |
Asian other | 85 | 49 | 109 |
Black | 80 | 36 | 107 |
Black African | 83 | 40 | 108 |
Black Caribbean | 74 | 26 | 105 |
Black other | 78 | 33 | 107 |
Chinese | 88 | 56 | 110 |
Mixed | 79 | 34 | 107 |
Mixed White/Asian | 84 | 41 | 108 |
Mixed White/Black African | 80 | 33 | 106 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 73 | 25 | 105 |
Mixed other | 80 | 36 | 107 |
White | 76 | 28 | 105 |
White British | 76 | 28 | 106 |
White Irish | 82 | 39 | 107 |
White Irish Traveller | 33 | 6 | 98 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 29 | 4 | 97 |
White other | 72 | 29 | 105 |
Other | 76 | 34 | 107 |
Download table data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity’ (CSV) Source data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity’ (CSV)
Summary of Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 (key stage 2) Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity Summary
The data shows that:
- overall, in 2016/17, 77% of pupils met the expected standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling by the end of key stage 2 (when they are usually aged 10 to 11 years), and 31% of pupils met the higher standard
- 88% of pupils from the Chinese and Indian ethnic groups met the expected standard (the highest percentages of any ethnic group); Chinese and Indian pupils also had the highest percentage of pupils meeting the higher standard (at 56% and 52% respectively)
- 29% of Gypsy/Roma pupils met the expected standard and 4% met the higher standard (the lowest percentages of any ethnic group)
- pupils from the Chinese and Indian ethnic groups had the highest average scaled scores, at 110 (compared with the overall average of 106); Gypsy/Roma pupils had the lowest average scaled score, at 97
3. Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and area
Local authority | All | Asian | Black | Chinese | Mixed | White |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | % | % | % | % | % | |
Barking and Dagenham | 81 | 87 | 87 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 75 |
Barnet | 85 | 90 | 84 | 93 | 83 | 85 |
Barnsley | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 57 | N/A* | 85 | 75 |
Bath and North East Somerset | 79 | 86 | 54 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 79 |
Bedford | 72 | 77 | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 70 |
Bexley | 80 | 90 | 86 | 100 | 82 | 76 |
Birmingham | 78 | 83 | 78 | 89 | 76 | 74 |
Blackburn with Darwen | 79 | 83 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 77 | 75 |
Blackpool | 78 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 78 |
Bolton | 79 | 86 | 72 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 | 77 |
Bournemouth | 77 | 86 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 76 |
Bracknell Forest | 76 | 87 | 89 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 86 | 74 |
Bradford | 75 | 80 | 70 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 72 |
Brent | 81 | 83 | 81 | 100 | 78 | 82 |
Brighton and Hove | 78 | 82 | 74 | 75 | 78 | 78 |
Bristol, City of | 76 | 82 | 73 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 74 | 76 |
Bromley | 85 | 91 | 87 | 91 | 87 | 83 |
Buckinghamshire | 79 | 84 | 79 | 100 | 73 | 79 |
Bury | 80 | 81 | 80 | 100 | 77 | 80 |
Calderdale | 76 | 80 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 76 | 74 |
Cambridgeshire | 75 | 82 | 72 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 80 | 75 |
Camden | 83 | 87 | 85 | 100 | 77 | 81 |
Central Bedfordshire | 73 | 83 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 71 | 73 |
Cheshire East | 81 | 93 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 86 | 80 |
Cheshire West and Chester | 79 | 94 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 77 | 78 |
City of London | 92 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality |
Cornwall | 73 | 74 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 72 |
County Durham | 79 | 89 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 89 | 79 |
Coventry | 78 | 86 | 82 | 100 | 77 | 75 |
Croydon | 80 | 89 | 77 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 76 | 79 |
Cumbria | 76 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 89 | 76 |
Darlington | 78 | 85 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 89 | 78 |
Derby | 74 | 80 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 74 | 72 |
Derbyshire | 76 | 88 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 82 | 80 | 76 |
Devon | 76 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 64 | 60 | 77 | 76 |
Doncaster | 72 | 80 | 70 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 | 71 |
Dorset | 73 | 76 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 77 | 73 |
Dudley | 73 | 77 | 74 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 74 | 72 |
Ealing | 84 | 86 | 79 | 100 | 83 | 86 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 77 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 85 | 77 |
East Sussex | 71 | 77 | 67 | 100 | 76 | 71 |
Enfield | 78 | 89 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 83 | 75 |
Essex | 79 | 91 | 88 | 89 | 81 | 78 |
Gateshead | 82 | 76 | 80 | 100 | 85 | 82 |
Gloucestershire | 77 | 90 | 74 | 72 | 73 | 77 |
Greenwich | 82 | 90 | 86 | 100 | 83 | 75 |
Hackney | 84 | 89 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 82 |
Halton | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 76 | 75 |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 87 | 83 | 87 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 88 | 86 |
Hampshire | 78 | 92 | 88 | 90 | 81 | 77 |
Haringey | 81 | 89 | 80 | 79 | 82 | 81 |
Harrow | 87 | 92 | 80 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 86 | 83 |
Hartlepool | 81 | 86 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 |
Havering | 84 | 90 | 90 | 82 | 84 | 83 |
Herefordshire, County of | 76 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 76 |
Hertfordshire | 80 | 87 | 85 | 93 | 80 | 79 |
Hillingdon | 83 | 89 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 88 | 78 |
Hounslow | 84 | 88 | 83 | 100 | 85 | 79 |
Isle of Wight | 70 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 71 | 70 |
Isles of Scilly | 76 | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | N/A* | 76 |
Islington | 81 | 87 | 81 | 100 | 82 | 80 |
Kensington and Chelsea | 91 | 87 | 90 | 100 | 92 | 91 |
Kent | 76 | 91 | 87 | 84 | 82 | 75 |
Kingston upon Hull, City of | 76 | 88 | 68 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 87 | 75 |
Kingston upon Thames | 86 | 91 | 85 | 100 | 87 | 85 |
Kirklees | 76 | 79 | 70 | 86 | 69 | 75 |
Knowsley | 74 | 86 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | 78 | 74 |
Lambeth | 85 | 90 | 83 | 83 | 86 | 86 |
Lancashire | 78 | 80 | 73 | 89 | 80 | 77 |
Leeds | 75 | 78 | 74 | 86 | 72 | 74 |
Leicester | 76 | 84 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 77 | 66 |
Leicestershire | 77 | 86 | 81 | 100 | 77 | 76 |
Lewisham | 77 | 86 | 76 | 91 | 77 | 76 |
Lincolnshire | 74 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 90 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 73 |
Liverpool | 75 | 86 | 76 | 88 | 80 | 74 |
Luton | 79 | 82 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 74 |
Manchester | 79 | 82 | 81 | 81 | 77 | 77 |
Medway | 70 | 87 | 84 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 71 | 68 |
Merton | 84 | 92 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 82 | 80 |
Middlesbrough | 78 | 82 | 71 | N/A* | 72 | 77 |
Milton Keynes | 80 | 91 | 85 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 76 |
Newcastle upon Tyne | 78 | 83 | 85 | 83 | 79 | 77 |
Newham | 86 | 88 | 86 | 100 | 85 | 77 |
Norfolk | 70 | 89 | 70 | 85 | 70 | 70 |
North East Lincolnshire | 74 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 83 | 74 |
North Lincolnshire | 76 | 94 | 62 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 76 |
North Somerset | 75 | 76 | 67 | 100 | 81 | 75 |
North Tyneside | 79 | 87 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 78 |
North Yorkshire | 74 | 83 | 81 | 82 | 79 | 74 |
Northamptonshire | 74 | 78 | 77 | 88 | 76 | 73 |
Northumberland | 74 | 91 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 78 | 73 |
Nottingham | 76 | 84 | 79 | 72 | 76 | 72 |
Nottinghamshire | 77 | 85 | 71 | 91 | 77 | 77 |
Oldham | 77 | 79 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 76 |
Oxfordshire | 77 | 80 | 75 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 | 76 |
Peterborough | 70 | 78 | 72 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 76 | 68 |
Plymouth | 76 | 100 | 63 | 75 | 85 | 76 |
Poole | 72 | 88 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 71 |
Portsmouth | 75 | 83 | 84 | 56 | 80 | 73 |
Reading | 78 | 83 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 68 | 78 |
Redbridge | 84 | 87 | 80 | 85 | 84 | 78 |
Redcar and Cleveland | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | N/A* | withheld to protect confidentiality | 86 | 83 |
Richmond upon Thames | 90 | 92 | 84 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 90 | 89 |
Rochdale | 77 | 82 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 | 75 |
Rotherham | 76 | 81 | 85 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 82 | 75 |
Rutland | 81 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 80 |
Salford | 78 | 93 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 80 | 77 |
Sandwell | 77 | 85 | 78 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 77 | 73 |
Sefton | 80 | 89 | 77 | 63 | 78 | 80 |
Sheffield | 74 | 81 | 80 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 73 | 73 |
Shropshire | 75 | 76 | 50 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 85 | 75 |
Slough | 81 | 88 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 69 |
Solihull | 79 | 87 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 78 |
Somerset | 74 | 88 | 67 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 74 |
South Gloucestershire | 78 | 90 | 83 | 100 | 77 | 77 |
South Tyneside | 79 | 90 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 91 | 78 |
Southampton | 76 | 81 | 80 | 100 | 79 | 74 |
Southend-on-Sea | 80 | 93 | 94 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 85 | 78 |
Southwark | 81 | 88 | 81 | 88 | 79 | 79 |
St. Helens | 78 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 77 |
Staffordshire | 78 | 82 | 82 | 87 | 80 | 78 |
Stockport | 80 | 84 | 79 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 82 | 79 |
Stockton-on-Tees | 80 | 90 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 92 | 79 |
Stoke-on-Trent | 73 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 74 | 71 |
Suffolk | 72 | 87 | 80 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 74 | 72 |
Sunderland | 81 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 100 | 78 | 81 |
Surrey | 81 | 89 | 82 | 92 | 85 | 80 |
Sutton | 84 | 96 | 91 | 88 | 86 | 80 |
Swindon | 79 | 89 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 77 |
Tameside | 77 | 82 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 77 |
Telford and Wrekin | 77 | 80 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 79 | 76 |
Thurrock | 78 | 93 | 89 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 80 | 75 |
Torbay | 76 | 100 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 86 | 75 |
Tower Hamlets | 84 | 87 | 84 | 83 | 75 | 74 |
Trafford | 85 | 92 | 80 | 92 | 85 | 84 |
Wakefield | 72 | 76 | 80 | 55 | 75 | 71 |
Walsall | 74 | 83 | 79 | 100 | 72 | 71 |
Waltham Forest | 82 | 85 | 80 | 91 | 81 | 80 |
Wandsworth | 84 | 84 | 81 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 81 | 86 |
Warrington | 83 | 93 | 80 | 100 | 89 | 82 |
Warwickshire | 77 | 92 | 76 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 83 | 76 |
West Berkshire | 76 | 89 | 82 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | 75 |
West Sussex | 74 | 83 | 73 | 86 | 80 | 73 |
Westminster | 86 | 90 | 88 | 100 | 87 | 86 |
Wigan | 80 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 84 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 83 | 80 |
Wiltshire | 74 | 92 | 59 | 71 | 76 | 74 |
Windsor and Maidenhead | 79 | 91 | 63 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 80 | 78 |
Wirral | 75 | 85 | 100 | 100 | 87 | 75 |
Wokingham | 85 | 95 | 93 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 86 | 83 |
Wolverhampton | 79 | 86 | 85 | withheld to protect confidentiality | 75 | 75 |
Worcestershire | 73 | 78 | 71 | 100 | 77 | 72 |
York | 76 | 83 | withheld to protect confidentiality | withheld to protect confidentiality | 78 | 76 |
Download table data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and area’ (CSV) Source data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and area’ (CSV)
Summary of Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 (key stage 2) Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and area Summary
Except for the information for White pupils, the statistics quoted for attainment by ethnicity and local authority are often based on small numbers of pupils and are therefore highly variable over time. The number of pupils from different ethnic groups varies considerably between local authorities, and data isn't published for some local authorities where the number of pupils is 5 or fewer. For these reasons, you should avoid comparing differences in attainment between local authorities.
The Isle of Scilly had 17 pupils in year 6, and the City of London had 26 – results for these local authorities are particularly variable, and any comparisons with them are not recommended.
The data shows that:
- in 2016/17, 92% of pupils in the City of London local authority met the expected standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling by the end of key stage 2 – this was the highest percentage out of all local authorities, followed by Kensington and Chelsea (London), where 91% of pupils met the standard
- the local authorities where the lowest percentage of pupils met the expected standard (at 70%) were Norfolk and Peterborough (both in the East of England), and the Isle of Wight, and Medway (both in the South East)
- 100% of Asian pupils met the expected standard in Rutland (East Midlands), Herefordshire (West Midlands), Plymouth, and Torbay (both in the South West), while 74% did so in Cornwall (South West) – these were the highest and lowest percentages of Asian pupils meeting the standard out of all local authorities
- 100% of Black pupils met the expected standard in South Tyneside (North East), Wirral (North West) and Dorset (South West), while 50% did so in Shropshire (West Midlands)
- 100% of Chinese pupils met the expected standard in 28 local authorities (out of the 74 for which data was available), while 55% did so in Wakefield (in Yorkshire and the Humber)
- 92% of pupils with Mixed ethnicity met the expected standard in Kensington and Chelsea (London) and Stockton-on-Tees (North East), while 68% did so in Reading (South East)
- 91% of White pupils met the expected standard in Kensington and Chelsea (London), while 66% did so in Leicester (East Midlands)
4. Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and gender
Boys | Girls | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethnicity | Boys Expected standard | Boys Higher standard | Boys Average scaled score | Girls Expected standard | Girls Higher standard | Girls Average scaled score |
All | 73 | 27 | 105 | 81 | 35 | 107 |
Asian | 80 | 38 | 107 | 87 | 48 | 109 |
Bangladeshi | 82 | 38 | 108 | 89 | 49 | 109 |
Indian | 85 | 47 | 109 | 91 | 58 | 111 |
Pakistani | 75 | 30 | 106 | 84 | 40 | 108 |
Asian other | 83 | 44 | 109 | 88 | 54 | 110 |
Black | 76 | 32 | 106 | 85 | 41 | 108 |
Black African | 79 | 36 | 107 | 87 | 45 | 109 |
Black Caribbean | 68 | 20 | 104 | 80 | 32 | 106 |
Black other | 74 | 28 | 106 | 82 | 37 | 107 |
Chinese | 85 | 51 | 110 | 91 | 61 | 111 |
Mixed | 75 | 29 | 106 | 84 | 39 | 108 |
Mixed White/Asian | 80 | 35 | 107 | 87 | 47 | 109 |
Mixed White/Black African | 76 | 28 | 106 | 84 | 37 | 107 |
Mixed White/Black Caribbean | 67 | 20 | 104 | 80 | 30 | 106 |
Mixed other | 77 | 31 | 106 | 84 | 41 | 108 |
White | 71 | 24 | 105 | 80 | 33 | 106 |
White British | 72 | 24 | 105 | 81 | 33 | 106 |
White Irish | 78 | 35 | 107 | 85 | 43 | 108 |
White Irish Traveller | 28 | 4 | 97 | 39 | 9 | 99 |
White Gypsy/Roma | 24 | 3 | 95 | 34 | 5 | 98 |
White other | 69 | 26 | 105 | 76 | 33 | 106 |
Other | 73 | 31 | 106 | 80 | 38 | 107 |
Download table data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and gender’ (CSV) Source data for ‘Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and gender’ (CSV)
Summary of Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 (key stage 2) Grammar, punctuation and spelling attainment for children aged 10 to 11 by ethnicity and gender Summary
The data shows that:
- in every ethnic group, a higher percentage of girls than boys met the expected and higher standards in grammar, punctuation and spelling in 2016/17
- overall, 81% of girls met the expected standard compared with 73% of boys, and 35% of girls met the higher standard compared with 27% of boys
- 91% of girls from the Chinese and Indian ethnic groups met the expected standard, the highest percentage of any ethnic group across both boys and girls
- 24% of Gypsy/Roma boys met the expected standard, the lowest percentage of any ethnic group across both boys and girls
- the biggest gap between girls and boys, at 13 percentage points, was found in the Mixed White and Black Caribbean ethnic group, where 80% of girls and 67% of boys met the expected standard
- the smallest attainment gap, at 2 percentage points, was found in the Gypsy/Roma ethnic group, where 5% of girls and 3% of boys met the higher standard
- girls from the Chinese and Indian ethnic groups had the highest average scaled score (at 111, compared with the overall average of 106), and Gypsy/Roma boys had the lowest average scaled score (95)
5. Methodology
The key stage 2 datasets are compiled using information matched together from 3 data sources:
- prior attainment records (key stage 1 results)
- school census records
- qualification entries and results collected from awarding bodies
Key stage assessment data received from the Standard Testing Agency (STA) is combined with information on pupil's characteristics from the school census and prior attainment. Records are matched, using fields such as surname, forename, date of birth, UPN (unique pupil number), gender and postcode. This successfully matches around 60% to 75% of pupils.
Additional, more complex, routines are then applied to match as many of the remaining pupils as possible, up to around 98%. The coverage of the local authority and regional statistics is state-funded mainstream schools only in England. This includes schools and academies but excludes hospital schools, pupil referral units and alternative provision.
Any pupils who do not have a valid result for a subject are excluded from the calculations for that subject and do not appear in the number of eligible pupils or in the outcome percentages for that subject.
Valid results for the national test figures are:
- achieved the expected standard
- not achieved the expected standard
- special consideration
- absent
- working below the standard of the test
- unable to access the test
Changes to assessment:
Because of a change in the way pupils are assessed, data published before 2016 is not comparable to 2015/16 and 2016/17 data.
The system of national curriculum levels is no longer used by the government to report on end of key stage assessment.
This measure has been replaced by 'value added' progress measures in reading, writing and mathematics.
There is no 'target' for the amount of progress an individual pupil is expected to make, and any amount of progress a pupil makes contributes towards the school's progress scores.
Suppression rules and disclosure control
Values of 1 or 2 or a percentage based on 1 or 2 pupils who achieved, or did not achieve, a particular standard are suppressed. Some additional figures may be suppressed to prevent the possibility of a suppressed figure being revealed. This suppression is consistent with DfE’s statistical policy statement on confidentiality (PDF opens in a new window or tab) (PDF).
Regional eligible pupil figures are rounded to the nearest 10 so that it is not possible to derive figures for these local authorities by summing the figures for the other local authorities in the region.
In the school level data, any figures relating to a cohort of 5 pupils or fewer are suppressed. This applies to sub-groups of pupils as well as the whole cohort, for example, if there were five boys and three girls in a school, DfE would not publish attainment for boys or girls separately but would publish attainment for all pupils as this is based on 8 pupils. The Code of Practice for Official Statistics requires DfE to take reasonable steps to ensure that their published or disseminated statistics protect confidentiality.
For more information about DfE’s disclosure control procedures for its statistical releases please see DfE’s statistical policy statement on confidentiality (PDF opens in a new window or tab) (PDF).
Rounding
Percentages given in charts, tables and downloads are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Related publications
Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2017
Quality and methodology information
6. Data sources
Source
Type of data
Administrative data
Type of statistic
National Statistics
Publisher
Department for Education
Note on corrections or updates
The Department for Education (DfE) published an updated version of these statistics on 25 January 2018.
Publication frequency
Yearly
Purpose of data source
The main purpose is to measure schools' and pupils' progress and performance from key stage 1 to key stage 2, in order to monitor and improve standards and inform parental choice when applying to local schools.
7. Download the data
This file contains the following variables: Measure, Ethnicity, Ethnicity_Type, Time, Time_Type, Geography (England), Geography_Code, Gender, Value, Value_Type, Denominator.
This file contains the following variables: Measure, Ethnicity, Ethnicity_Type, Time, Time_Type, Region, Local_Authority, Local_Authority_Code, Value, Value_Type, Denominator.